This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce White more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce White. The network helps show where Bruce White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce White.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce White based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce White. Bruce White is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hine, Gregory, Judy Anderson, Linda Galligan, et al.. (2016). Teaching Secondary Mathematics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
4.
Chinnappan, Mohan & Bruce White. (2015). Specialised Content Knowledge: Evidence of Pre-Service Teachers' Appraisal of Student Errors in Proportional Reasoning.. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.3 indexed citations
5.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2015). AITP-Sponsored Enhancements to the Information Systems Model Curriculum.
6.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2013). Preservice Teachers Experience with Online Modules about TPACK. 27(3). 124–132.6 indexed citations
7.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2011). IS 2010 and ABET Accreditation: An Analysis of ABET-Accredited Information Systems Programs.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 22(4). 347–354.6 indexed citations
8.
White, Bruce. (2011). Your books are in the mail: fifty years of distance library service at Massey University. Massey Research Online (Massey University).
9.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2010). Study Groups as Tools for Reflective Practice and Professional Development: The Akron experience. Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne).1 indexed citations
10.
White, Bruce. (2010). Using ICT to Enhance Curriculum Opportunities for Students in Rural and Remote Schools. 25(2). 27–30.8 indexed citations
11.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2010). Learner practice and satisfaction in a blended learning environment. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 569–578.
12.
Reading, Chris, A Fluck, Sue Trinidad, et al.. (2009). Focusing on ICT in Rural and Regional Education in Australia. eSpace (Curtin University). 131–145.3 indexed citations
13.
White, Bruce, Alan Barnes, Michael J. Lawson, & W. Johnson. (2009). Student Perceptions of What Makes Good Teaching..2 indexed citations
14.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2008). Assessment: Placing the Emphasis on Learning in Information Systems Programs and Classes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(2). 165–168.2 indexed citations
15.
White, Bruce, et al.. (2004). No End In Sight – Information Skills For Academics And Researchers. Massey Research Online (Massey University).1 indexed citations
16.
Mayer, Diane, et al.. (2000). ICT in the practicum in preservice teacher education. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.