Countries citing papers authored by Herbert E. Longenecker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert E. Longenecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert E. Longenecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert E. Longenecker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert E. Longenecker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert E. Longenecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert E. Longenecker. The network helps show where Herbert E. Longenecker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert E. Longenecker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert E. Longenecker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert E. Longenecker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert E. Longenecker. Herbert E. Longenecker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feinstein, David, Herbert E. Longenecker, & Dina Shrestha. (2014). A Study of Information Systems Programs Accredited by ABET In Relation to IS 2010. Information Systems Education Journal. 12(3). 76–84.3 indexed citations
2.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2013). A Database Management Assessment Instrument. Information Systems Education Journal. 11(2). 63–76.17 indexed citations
3.
Babb, Jeffry, et al.. (2012). Engaging in Reflective Decision-Making: The Role of Skills in the Developmentof the Information Systems Undergraduate Curriculum. 12(2). 20–33.2 indexed citations
4.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2012). A Health Informatics Curriculum Congruent with IS 2010 and IMIA Recommendations for an Undergraduate Degree.. Information Systems Education Journal. 10(2). 15–32.7 indexed citations
5.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2012). Health Informatics as an ABET-CAC Accreditable IS Program.. Information Systems Education Journal. 10(6). 51–62.2 indexed citations
6.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2010). A Recommendation for a Professional Focus Area in Data Management for the IS2002 Information Systems Model Curriculum.. Information Systems Education Journal. 8(68).2 indexed citations
7.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2010). IS 2002 and ABET Accreditation: Meeting the ABET Program Outcome Criteria.. Information Systems Education Journal. 8(67).7 indexed citations
8.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2008). A Methodology to Assist Faculty in Developing Successful Approaches for Achieving Learner Centered Information Systems Curriculum Outcomes: Team Based Methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(2). 181–196.8 indexed citations
9.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2008). Why is the Learner-Centered Paradigm So Profoundly Important for Information Systems Education?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(2). 175–180.12 indexed citations
10.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2008). From Teaching to Learning: Learner-Centered Teaching and Assessment in Information Systems Education. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(2). 169–174.44 indexed citations
11.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2007). Integrating Institutional and Individual Information Systems Assessment Through the Center for Computing Education Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
12.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2006). Development-Process-Flow Templates to Advance a Functional Presentation of the DAMA Curriculum Framework to Ensure Information Quality by Achieving CMMI Level 3 in Enterprise Projects.. ICIQ. 523–538.2 indexed citations
13.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (2004). Using IS2002 to Assess the Impact of a Proposed Curriculum Change. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 139(4). 363–7.4 indexed citations
Doran, Michael, et al.. (2000). Using Polya to Teach System Development Methodologies: Fostering a Role Perspective in IS Students. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(1). 67–72.1 indexed citations
16.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (1999). IS'2000: On Updating the IS'97 Model Curriculum for Undergraduate Programs of Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10(2). 5–7.6 indexed citations
17.
Gorgone, John T., Gordon B. Davis, Joseph S. Valacich, et al.. (1996). IS 2002 Model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 239.30 indexed citations
18.
Longenecker, Herbert E., et al.. (1994). Information Systems '95: A Summary of the Collaborative IS Curriculum Specification of the Joint DPMA, ACM, AIS Task Force. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education. 6(4). 174–187.28 indexed citations
19.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Fred D. Davis, John T. Gorgone, Herbert E. Longenecker, & David C. Miller. (1994). Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 213–227.65 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.