Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of A Fluck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Fluck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Fluck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Fluck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Fluck. The network helps show where A Fluck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Fluck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Fluck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Fluck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Fluck. A Fluck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kenny, John & A Fluck. (2019). Academic administration and service workloads in Australian universities. Australian universities' review. 61(2). 21–30.5 indexed citations
4.
Fluck, A. (2017). BYO laptop: an e-exams pilot project. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
Spector, J. Michael, Dirk Ifenthaler, Demetrios G. Sampson, et al.. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st Century learning. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).98 indexed citations
7.
Fluck, A & Mathew Hillier. (2016). Innovative assessment with eExams. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).5 indexed citations
8.
Fluck, A, Mary Webb, Margaret Cox, et al.. (2016). Arguing for computer science in the school curriculum. Educational Technology & Society. 19(3). 38–46.36 indexed citations
9.
Webb, Mary, A Fluck, Martha J. Cox, et al.. (2015). Curriculum - Advancing understanding of the roles of computer science/informatics in the curriculum. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
10.
Fluck, A. (2013). Implementation of on-campus digital examination practices. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
11.
Kenny, John, et al.. (2012). Placing a value on academic work The development and implementation of a time-based academic workload model. Australian universities' review. 54(2). 50–60.12 indexed citations
12.
Fluck, A. (2012). Farewell to pen and paper. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
13.
Fluck, A, et al.. (2011). Calculus in elementary school: an example of ICT-based curriculum transformation. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2011(1). 159–174.5 indexed citations
14.
Fluck, A. (2011). Laptop classes in some Australian government primary schools. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 26(1). 10–15.2 indexed citations
15.
Fluck, A. (2009). Towards Transformation: Envisioning New Learning Outcomes for ICT. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1. 10–18.2 indexed citations
16.
Reading, Chris, A Fluck, Sue Trinidad, et al.. (2009). Focusing on ICT in Rural and Regional Education in Australia. eSpace (Curtin University). 131–145.3 indexed citations
17.
Fluck, A, et al.. (2006). User-owned computers: friend or foe in schools?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
18.
Fluck, A. (2001). Some national and regional frameworks for integrating information and communication technology into school education. Educational Technology & Society. 4(3). 145–152.3 indexed citations
19.
Fluck, A. (1996). Computers as Tutors. Figshare. 22.1 indexed citations
20.
Fluck, A. (1995). Information Technology in Two National Curricula. Figshare. 1–364.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.