Brad Gilbreath

1.1k citations
30 papers · 712 indexed · h-index 12

Brad Gilbreath

28 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Brad Gilbreath
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 408
  • Social Psychology 261
  • General Health Professions 226
  • Demography 73
  • Research and Theory 5
Replace Ana Maria Rossi with:
Ana Maria Rossi United States
Olivia Amanda O’Neill United States
Mustafa Koyuncu Türkiye
Chris W. L. Chu United Kingdom
I.J. Hetty van Emmerik Netherlands
Harry Garst Netherlands
Mari Huhtala Finland
Zhengxue Luo China
Linda Trenberth United Kingdom
Nai-Wen Chi Taiwan
Brad Gilbreath relative to Ana Maria Rossi United States Ana Maria Rossi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Ana Maria Rossi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brad Gilbreath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brad Gilbreath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad Gilbreath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad Gilbreath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brad Gilbreath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad Gilbreath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad Gilbreath. The network helps show where Brad Gilbreath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brad Gilbreath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brad Gilbreath Line = papers co-authored together Brad Gilbreath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20229
2 20225
3 202023
4 201912
5 201828
6 20149
7 201213
8 201110
9 201111
10
Top Management Credibility and Employee Cynicism: A Comprehensive Model.
20091
11 20087
12
Promoting Well-Being Through Healthy Supervision: Current Knowledge and Future Directions
20062
13 2004274
14 20028
15 20027
16 20022
17 20012
18 19980
19
Supervisor Behavior and Employee Health: A Topic Neglected by Management Educators
19971
20
The Ethics of Strategic Ambiguity: Contrasting Teleologically and Deontologically Based Experiences.
19952

About Brad Gilbreath

Brad Gilbreath is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (18 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (408 citations), Social Psychology (261 citations) and General Health Professions (226 citations). Brad Gilbreath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Philip G. Benson, Tae‐Yeol Kim, Max U. Montesino, Thomas S. Bateman, Lynne Andersson, Brooke E Nichols, Jessica G. Rainbow, Linsey M. Steege, Charles R. Wright and Michael R. Manning. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Human Relations and Organization Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026