Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes
2012739 citationsBirgit Schyns, Jan Schillingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Schyns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Schyns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Schyns more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Schyns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Schyns. The network helps show where Birgit Schyns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birgit Schyns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birgit Schyns.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birgit Schyns based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Birgit Schyns. Birgit Schyns is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schyns, Birgit, et al.. (2022). Me, Me, Me. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 230(4). 330–334.3 indexed citations
6.
Schyns, Birgit, et al.. (2018). In the eye of the public : examining the content of implicit leadership theories about football managers across two contexts.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).1 indexed citations
Kuijpers, Marinka, Birgit Schyns, & Jaap Scheerens. (2006). Career competences for career success.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).4 indexed citations
12.
Schyns, Birgit, et al.. (2005). Implicit leadership theories : Essays and explorations. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).122 indexed citations
Schyns, Birgit & Paul Turner. (2005). Dyadic leadership and organizational outcomes; Different results of different instruments?. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 175–205.6 indexed citations
Schyns, Birgit & Karin Sanders. (2004). Impliciete leiderschap theorieën en de perceptie van transformationeel leiderschap: een replicatie van Duits onderzoek = Implicit leadership theories and the perception of transformational leadership : a replication of a German study.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).5 indexed citations
17.
Schyns, Birgit & Karin Sanders. (2004). Impliciete leiderschapstheorieen en de perceptie van transformationeel leiderschap. University of Twente Research Information. 17(2). 143–154.7 indexed citations
18.
Schyns, Birgit, et al.. (2003). Het stimuleren van solidair gedrag: een kwestie van leiderschap ? = Stimulating solidary behaviour : a question of leadership ?. Durham Research Online (Durham University).4 indexed citations
19.
Schyns, Birgit, et al.. (2003). Het stimuleren van solidair gedrag: een kwestie van leiderschap? (Encouragement of solidary behaviour: a matter of leadership?). 16. 237–254.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.