Amanda Jansen

1.3k total citations
40 papers, 814 citations indexed

About

Amanda Jansen is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Jansen has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 814 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Education, 10 papers in Statistics and Probability and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Jansen's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (23 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (14 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Amanda Jansen is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (23 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (14 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Amanda Jansen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Italy. Amanda Jansen's co-authors include Dawn Berk, James Hiebert, Anne Morris, James A. Middleton, Charles Hohensee, Raven McCrory, Tonya Bartell, Ralph T. Putnam, Marilena Pantziara and Sonja Lutovac and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Health Services Research and Harvard Educational Review.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Jansen

37 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Jansen United States 13 703 187 159 96 73 40 814
Glenda Anthony New Zealand 16 980 1.4× 247 1.3× 169 1.1× 77 0.8× 69 0.9× 47 1.1k
Kathleen Lynch United States 16 564 0.8× 118 0.6× 130 0.8× 48 0.5× 61 0.8× 31 689
Ngai‐Ying Wong Hong Kong 17 666 0.9× 157 0.8× 109 0.7× 103 1.1× 76 1.0× 36 781
Geoff Wake United Kingdom 14 545 0.8× 138 0.7× 76 0.5× 72 0.8× 94 1.3× 49 666
Leslie Jocelyn United States 7 449 0.6× 114 0.6× 118 0.7× 61 0.6× 61 0.8× 11 603
Lynn C. Hart United States 13 627 0.9× 110 0.6× 145 0.9× 89 0.9× 39 0.5× 34 737
Julia Aguirre United States 16 1.0k 1.4× 159 0.9× 168 1.1× 48 0.5× 219 3.0× 36 1.1k
Andreas Ryve Sweden 16 598 0.9× 175 0.9× 133 0.8× 30 0.3× 56 0.8× 48 690
Joanna O. Masingila United States 13 554 0.8× 168 0.9× 127 0.8× 45 0.5× 59 0.8× 39 676
Franziska Vogt Switzerland 13 471 0.7× 125 0.7× 82 0.5× 26 0.3× 124 1.7× 33 628

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Jansen. The network helps show where Amanda Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Jansen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Jansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Jansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Jansen. Amanda Jansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2024). Salience and feasibility of enacting rough draft math: Teachers’ voices about productive and powerful variations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 29(1). 83–106. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2024). Potentially engaging mathematics teaching practices in secondary classrooms: Investigating observation tool validity and score reliability. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 17(4). 327–345.
3.
Jansen, Amanda. (2023). Entangling and Disentangling Inquiry and Equity: Voices of Mathematics Education and Mathematics Professors. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 10–39. 3 indexed citations
4.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2023). Using teacher and student noticing to understand engagement in secondary mathematics lessons. School Science and Mathematics. 123(7). 324–334. 1 indexed citations
5.
Jansen, Amanda. (2023). Rough Draft Math. 2 indexed citations
6.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2019). Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Efforts to Engage Students through Academic and Social Support.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 5 indexed citations
7.
Hohensee, Charles & Amanda Jansen. (2017). Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Transitional Conceptions of Partitive Division with Proper-Fraction Divisors. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 19(4). 210–236. 9 indexed citations
8.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2016). Smallholder Dairy Value Chain Interventions; The Kenya Market-led Dairy Programme (KMDP) – Status Report. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2 indexed citations
9.
Hannula, Markku S., Pietro Di Martino, Marilena Pantziara, et al.. (2016). Attitudes, Beliefs, Motivation and Identity in Mathematics Education. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation). 100 indexed citations
10.
Jansen, Amanda & Charles Hohensee. (2015). Examining and elaborating upon the nature of elementary prospective teachers’ conceptions of partitive division with fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 19(6). 503–522. 16 indexed citations
11.
Bosma, Linda M., et al.. (2014). The Wiidookowishin Program: Results from a Qualitative Process Evaluation of a Culturally Tailored Commercial Tobacco Cessation Program. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research. 21(1). 18–34. 12 indexed citations
12.
Jansen, Amanda, et al.. (2014). Facilitators of health systems change for tobacco dependence treatment: a qualitative study of stakeholders? perceptions. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 575–575. 6 indexed citations
13.
Jansen, Amanda & Tonya Bartell. (2013). CARING MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION: Middle School Students' and Teachers' Perspectives. 8(1). 33–49. 2 indexed citations
14.
Jansen, Amanda, Beth Herbel‐Eisenmann, & John P. Smith. (2012). Detecting Students' Experiences of Discontinuities Between Middle School and High School Mathematics Programs: Learning During Boundary Crossing. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 14(4). 285–309. 12 indexed citations
16.
Jansen, Amanda. (2012). Developing Productive Dispositions during Small-Group Work in Two Sixth-Grade Mathematics Classrooms: Teachers' Facilitation Efforts and Students' Self-Reported Benefits.. 7(1). 37–56. 24 indexed citations
17.
Jansen, Amanda & James A. Middleton. (2011). Motivation Matters and Interest Counts: Fostering Engagement in Mathematics. 21 indexed citations
18.
McCrory, Raven, Ralph T. Putnam, & Amanda Jansen. (2008). Interaction in Online Courses for Teacher Education: Subject Matter and Pedagogy. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 16(2). 155–180. 37 indexed citations
19.
Hiebert, James, Anne Morris, Dawn Berk, & Amanda Jansen. (2006). Preparing Teachers to Learn from Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 58(1). 47–61. 331 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Jack L., Beth Herbel‐Eisenmann, & Amanda Jansen. (2000). Studying Mathematical Transitions: How Do Students Navigate Fundamental Changes in Curriculum and Pedagogy?. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026