Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition
This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Smith. The network helps show where John P. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John P. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John P. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John P. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John P. Smith. John P. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Martovetsky, N., K. Freudenberg, John P. Smith, et al.. (2025). Continuing Testing of the ITER CS Modules. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 35(5). 1–4.1 indexed citations
Martovetsky, N., K. Freudenberg, John P. Smith, et al.. (2023). Testing of the ITER CS Module #4. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(5). 1–6.4 indexed citations
Schild, T., C. Jong, N. Mitchell, et al.. (2022). Start of the ITER Central Solenoid Assembly. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 32(6). 1–5.8 indexed citations
11.
Levin, Mariana, et al.. (2020). Conceptualizing STEM Majors' Developing Agency and Autonomy in Undergraduate Mathematics.. ICLS.1 indexed citations
12.
Smith, John P., et al.. (2016). The Definitions of Spatial Quantities in Elementary Curriculum Materials. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 74–80.2 indexed citations
Stambaugh, R.D., V. S. Chan, A. M. Garofalo, John P. Smith, & C.P.C. Wong. (2008). Fusion Development Facility Mission. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 50.1 indexed citations
16.
Star, Jon R., Beth Herbel‐Eisenmann, & John P. Smith. (2000). Algebraic Concepts: What's Really New in New Curricula?.. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 5(7).2 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, W. R., et al.. (1997). Vanadium alloys for fusion applications. AM&P Technical Articles. 151(6). 25–28.2 indexed citations
18.
Reis, E.E., et al.. (1996). Structural design of the DIII-D radiative divertor. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).3 indexed citations
19.
Smith, John P. & George A. Youngs. (1984). Assessing leadership potential. NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University).1 indexed citations
20.
Molnar, Joseph J. & John P. Smith. (1981). Satisfaction with Rural Services: The Policy Preferences of Leaders and Community Residents.. Rural Sociology. 47(3). 496–511.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.