John P. Smith

4.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
108 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

John P. Smith is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, John P. Smith has authored 108 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 39 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 35 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in John P. Smith's work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (45 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (38 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (34 papers). John P. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Superconducting Materials and Applications (45 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (38 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (34 papers). John P. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. John P. Smith's co-authors include Andrea A. diSessa, Jeremy Roschelle, Natasha M. Speer, W. R. Johnson, Lorraine M. Males, Jeong‐Kyun Choi, J. H. Whealton, Mark Girod, J. C. Whitson and R.D. Stambaugh and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Computational Physics and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

John P. Smith

102 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of ... 1994 2026 2004 2015 1994 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John P. Smith United States 19 1.5k 741 350 305 263 108 2.4k
Peter Blatchford United Kingdom 44 3.5k 2.3× 1.5k 2.0× 89 0.3× 195 0.6× 54 0.2× 143 4.8k
Lillian C. McDermott United States 39 5.2k 3.5× 2.1k 2.9× 169 0.5× 67 0.2× 81 0.3× 77 6.3k
Michael O’Loughlin United States 31 765 0.5× 602 0.8× 50 0.1× 29 0.1× 45 0.2× 138 3.7k
Brent Davis Canada 32 2.1k 1.4× 866 1.2× 403 1.2× 49 0.2× 22 0.1× 126 3.7k
Akihiko Takahashi Japan 21 569 0.4× 114 0.2× 57 0.2× 124 0.4× 73 0.3× 90 1.3k
David E. Meltzer United States 21 1.3k 0.9× 443 0.6× 43 0.1× 50 0.2× 50 0.2× 57 2.2k
Margaret Brown United Kingdom 23 1.5k 1.0× 283 0.4× 438 1.3× 4 0.0× 54 0.2× 136 2.5k
David Preiss United Kingdom 25 621 0.4× 227 0.3× 208 0.6× 18 0.1× 33 0.1× 146 2.8k
Eric Mazur United States 27 4.4k 2.9× 1.3k 1.7× 57 0.2× 6 0.0× 707 2.7× 53 6.3k
Catherine H. Crouch United States 25 2.4k 1.6× 703 0.9× 29 0.1× 7 0.0× 1.1k 4.2× 42 5.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John P. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John P. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Smith. The network helps show where John P. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John P. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John P. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John P. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John P. Smith. John P. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Martovetsky, N., K. Freudenberg, John P. Smith, et al.. (2025). Continuing Testing of the ITER CS Modules. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 35(5). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Miyoshi, Y., T. Schild, I. Rodin, et al.. (2025). ITER Central Solenoid Manufacturing and Assembly Progress. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 36(3). 1–7.
3.
Miyoshi, Y., N. Mitchell, T. Schild, et al.. (2024). Selected Topics of Technical Challenges of the ITER Central Solenoid. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(5). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
4.
Smith, John P., et al.. (2024). 4.5 K Paschen Qualification Testing of Terminal Joint and Voltage Tap Insulation Designs for ITER CS Module Test Facility. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(5). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
5.
Martovetsky, N., K. Freudenberg, John P. Smith, et al.. (2023). Testing of the ITER CS Module #4. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(5). 1–6. 4 indexed citations
6.
Smith, John P., N. Martovetsky, K. Freudenberg, et al.. (2023). ITER CS Module Test Facility Operational Lessons From CS Modules 1–4. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(5). 1–6. 5 indexed citations
7.
Smith, John P., et al.. (2023). Commissioning and Operation of ITER CS Module Test Facility: DC Power Supply and DC Breaker Systems. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 1–6. 2 indexed citations
8.
Smith, John P., et al.. (2022). Affect graphing: leveraging graphical representations in the study of students’ affect in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 110(3). 481–501. 2 indexed citations
9.
Hatton‐Bowers, Holly, et al.. (2022). Promising Findings that the Cultivating Healthy Intentional Mindful Educators’ Program (CHIME) Strengthens Early Childhood Teachers’ Emotional Resources: An Iterative Study. Early Childhood Education Journal. 51(7). 1291–1304. 14 indexed citations
10.
Schild, T., C. Jong, N. Mitchell, et al.. (2022). Start of the ITER Central Solenoid Assembly. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 32(6). 1–5. 8 indexed citations
11.
Levin, Mariana, et al.. (2020). Conceptualizing STEM Majors' Developing Agency and Autonomy in Undergraduate Mathematics.. ICLS. 1 indexed citations
12.
Smith, John P., et al.. (2016). The Definitions of Spatial Quantities in Elementary Curriculum Materials. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 74–80. 2 indexed citations
13.
Jansen, Amanda, Beth Herbel‐Eisenmann, & John P. Smith. (2012). Detecting Students' Experiences of Discontinuities Between Middle School and High School Mathematics Programs: Learning During Boundary Crossing. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 14(4). 285–309. 12 indexed citations
14.
Wheeler, Anne, et al.. (2011). Study skills enhancement through geography and environmental fieldwork. Planet. 24(1). 14–20. 10 indexed citations
15.
Stambaugh, R.D., V. S. Chan, A. M. Garofalo, John P. Smith, & C.P.C. Wong. (2008). Fusion Development Facility Mission. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 50. 1 indexed citations
16.
Star, Jon R., Beth Herbel‐Eisenmann, & John P. Smith. (2000). Algebraic Concepts: What's Really New in New Curricula?.. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 5(7). 2 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, W. R., et al.. (1997). Vanadium alloys for fusion applications. AM&P Technical Articles. 151(6). 25–28. 2 indexed citations
18.
Reis, E.E., et al.. (1996). Structural design of the DIII-D radiative divertor. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3 indexed citations
19.
Smith, John P. & George A. Youngs. (1984). Assessing leadership potential. NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University). 1 indexed citations
20.
Molnar, Joseph J. & John P. Smith. (1981). Satisfaction with Rural Services: The Policy Preferences of Leaders and Community Residents.. Rural Sociology. 47(3). 496–511. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026