Wolfgang Gräber

588 total citations
11 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Wolfgang Gräber is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolfgang Gräber has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Education, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Wolfgang Gräber's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (3 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers). Wolfgang Gräber is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (3 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers). Wolfgang Gräber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Estonia. Wolfgang Gräber's co-authors include Thomas R. Koballa, Reinders Duit, Michael Komorek, Priit Reiska, Angela Kross, Sigmar‐Olaf Tergan, P. Häussler, Thorsten Erdmann, Jan Alexis Nielsen and Martin Lindner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Science Education and Journal of Science Teacher Education.

In The Last Decade

Wolfgang Gräber

10 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Wolfgang Gräber

EDUCA

DEP

SP

SPS

ECP

Roberta J. Aram United States

Peter Nentwig Germany

Feral Ogan‐Bekiroglu Türkiye

Christian Buty France

Helena Pedrosa de Jesus United Kingdom

Anders Isnes Norway

Nicos Papadouris Cyprus

Rodney B. Thiele Australia

Aeran Choi United States

Dimitris Koliopoulos Greece

Roberta J. Aram United States

Wolfgang Gräber

275 ×1.1

EDUCA

102 ×0.8

DEP

19 ×0.7

SP

13 ×0.5

SPS

16 ×0.9

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Wolfgang Gräber Wolfgang Gräber (= 1×) peers Roberta J. Aram

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Gräber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Gräber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Gräber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Gräber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Gräber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Gräber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Gräber. The network helps show where Wolfgang Gräber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Gräber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Gräber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Gräber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Gräber. Wolfgang Gräber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Gräber, Wolfgang. (2011). German High School Students' Interest in Chemistry – A Comparison between 1990 and 2008. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 22(2). 134–140. 12 indexed citations

2.

Nielsen, Jan Alexis, Martin Lindner, Cecília Galvão, et al.. (2009). Popularity and relevance of science education and scientific literacy: The PARSEL Project in Europe. University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark). 183–184. 3 indexed citations

3.

Tergan, Sigmar‐Olaf, et al.. (2006). Concept Map-based Visualization of Knowledge and Information in Resource-Based Learning. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2006(1). 2425–2429. 1 indexed citations

4.

Tergan, Sigmar‐Olaf, et al.. (2006). Mapping and managing knowledge and information in resource‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 43(4). 327–336. 18 indexed citations

5.

Gräber, Wolfgang. (2002). „Scientific Literacy" - Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in der Diskussion. peDOCS. 1–28. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gräber, Wolfgang, et al.. (2001). ParCIS: Aiming for Scientific Literacy through Self-Regulated Learning with the Internet.. 4 indexed citations

7.

Duit, Reinders, et al.. (2001). Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 123 indexed citations

8.

Koballa, Thomas R., et al.. (2000). Prospective gymnasium teachers' conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 22(2). 209–224. 97 indexed citations

9.

Duit, Reinders, et al.. (1999). Naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung. Perspektiven für die Unterrichtspraxis. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 10 indexed citations

10.

Koballa, Thomas R., et al.. (1999). Prospective Teachers' Conceptions of the Knowledge Base for Teaching Chemistry at the German Gymnasium. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 10(4). 269–286. 14 indexed citations

11.

Gräber, Wolfgang. (1990). Das Instrument MEDA : ein Verfahren zur Beschreibung, Analyse und Bewertung von Lernprogrammen. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact