This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Reis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Reis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Reis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Reis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Reis. The network helps show where Pedro Reis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pedro Reis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pedro Reis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pedro Reis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pedro Reis. Pedro Reis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Reis, Pedro, et al.. (2016). La formación de profesores: formación contínua o formación postgraduada? Perspectivas de profesores y de líderes de las escuelas. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
8.
Reis, Pedro. (2016). Formación de profesores: perspectivas de Brasil, Colombia, España y Portugal. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
9.
Reis, Pedro, et al.. (2016). The challenges of integrating the discussion of controversial issues in initial teacher training. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
10.
Reis, Pedro, et al.. (2014). Relatório de Avaliação do programa KidSmart. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT).
11.
Reis, Pedro. (2014). Acción Socio-Política sobre Cuestiones Socio-Científicas: Reconstruyendo la Formación Docente y el Currículo. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
Faria, Cláudia, Sofia Freire, Cecília Galvão, Pedro Reis, & Mónica Baptista. (2012). Students at Risk of Dropping out: How to Promote Their Engagement with School Science?.. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon). 23(1). 20–39.3 indexed citations
14.
Reis, Pedro & Nuria Climent. (2012). Narrativas de profesores: reflexiones en torno al desarrollo personal y profesional. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon).5 indexed citations
Reis, Pedro & Cecília Galvão. (2009). Teaching Controversial Socio-Scientific Issues in Biology and Geology Classes: A Case Study. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 13(1). 162–185.44 indexed citations
17.
Reis, Pedro, et al.. (2009). POTENCIALIDADES E LIMITAÇÕES DE SESSÕES DE DISCUSSÃO DE CONTROVÉRSIAS SOCIOCIENTÍFICAS COMO CONTRIBUTOS PARA A LITERACIA CIENTÍFICA. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon). 35(2). 167–183.3 indexed citations
18.
Reis, Pedro. (2008). A escola e as controvérsias sociocientíficas: perspectivas de alunos e professores. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon).7 indexed citations
19.
Reis, Pedro & Cecília Galvão. (2005). Controvérsias sócio-científicas e prática pedagógica de jovens professores. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências. 10(2). 131–160.8 indexed citations
20.
Galvão, Cecília & Pedro Reis. (2002). Um olhar sobre o conhecimento profissional dos professores: o estágio de Sofia. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon). 165–178.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.