Emily van Zee
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jim MinstrellAlan H. SchoenfeldDeborah RobertsDavid HammerChandralekha SinghMel SabellaN. Sanjay RebelloCorinne A. Manogue
- Topics
- Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyEducationGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily van Zee
10 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Education 302
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 146
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30
- Sociology and Political Science 27
- Social Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Emily van Zee
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily van Zee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily van Zee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily van Zee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily van Zee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily van Zee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily van Zee. The network helps show where Emily van Zee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily van Zee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily van Zee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily van Zee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily van Zee. Emily van Zee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Probeware and Web-Design Communication Enhance K-8 Teachers’ Scientific Proficiency in the Context of Thermal Phenomena | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Teacher Research: Exploring Student Thinking and Learning. | 3 |
| 6 | Seeing the science in children's thinking : case studies of student inquiry in physical science : a staff developer's guide | 3 |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 243 |
About Emily van Zee
Emily van Zee is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Computer Science Applications, having authored 10 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (146 citations), Education (302 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (30 citations). Emily van Zee has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jim Minstrell, Alan H. Schoenfeld, Deborah Roberts, David Hammer, Chandralekha Singh, Mel Sabella, N. Sanjay Rebello, Corinne A. Manogue, Margaret L. Niess and H. J. F. Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as Science Education, Journal of the Learning Sciences and The Journal of Mathematical Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.