Medical Terminology
- Topics
- Medical Research and PracticesHealthcare Systems and TechnologyHealth Sciences Research and Education
In The Last Decade
Medical Terminology
237 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Medical Terminology
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Medical Terminology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Medical Terminology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Terminology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Medical Terminology
This network shows the impact of papers covering Medical Terminology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Medical Terminology.
About Medical Terminology
4.6k papers covering Medical Terminology have received a total of 50.4k indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Medical Terminology are most often about the specific topic of Medical Research and Practices, Healthcare Systems and Technology and Health Sciences Research and Education and also cover the fields of Health Information Management, Anatomy and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Papers citing work on Medical Terminology are usually about Health Information Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Pharmacology. Some of the most active scholars covering Medical Terminology are Deborah H. Charbonneau, Alan Paton, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Geoffrey D. Maitland, Marc Berg, Anna R. Gagliardi, Alex Jadad, Lisa Bero, Jadwiga A. Wedzicha and Simon Gilbody.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.