Jack Holbrook

2.2k total citations
52 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Jack Holbrook is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Jack Holbrook has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Education, 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 11 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Jack Holbrook's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (31 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (19 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers). Jack Holbrook is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (31 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (19 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers). Jack Holbrook collaborates with scholars based in Estonia, Israel and Portugal. Jack Holbrook's co-authors include Miia Rannikmäe, Regina Soobard, Tõnis Mets, Ülo Mander, Alexandru Florian Crișan, Florence Mihaela Singer, Ain Kull, Priit Reiska, Raivo Aunap and Michael Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and International Journal of Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Jack Holbrook

50 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jack Holbrook Estonia 16 1.1k 404 144 119 111 52 1.4k
Miia Rannikmäe Estonia 15 1.2k 1.1× 432 1.1× 108 0.8× 106 0.9× 154 1.4× 67 1.5k
Alister Jones New Zealand 21 1.1k 0.9× 403 1.0× 66 0.5× 103 0.9× 92 0.8× 70 1.3k
George E. DeBoer United States 13 1.2k 1.0× 609 1.5× 118 0.8× 147 1.2× 71 0.6× 36 1.5k
Cory T. Forbes United States 24 1.2k 1.1× 534 1.3× 201 1.4× 188 1.6× 60 0.5× 76 1.5k
Anita Roychoudhury United States 16 1.2k 1.1× 784 1.9× 145 1.0× 160 1.3× 86 0.8× 27 1.5k
Elaine V. Howes United States 10 878 0.8× 442 1.1× 158 1.1× 141 1.2× 36 0.3× 20 1.1k
Keith B. Lucas Australia 16 662 0.6× 363 0.9× 60 0.4× 131 1.1× 85 0.8× 36 1.1k
Larry Bencze Canada 19 1.1k 1.0× 445 1.1× 223 1.5× 251 2.1× 79 0.7× 66 1.4k
Jale Çakıroğlu Türkiye 23 1.5k 1.3× 492 1.2× 183 1.3× 125 1.1× 90 0.8× 76 1.8k
Hilary Asoko United Kingdom 6 1.2k 1.0× 706 1.7× 48 0.3× 99 0.8× 47 0.4× 8 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Holbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Holbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Holbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Holbrook. The network helps show where Jack Holbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Holbrook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Holbrook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Holbrook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Holbrook. Jack Holbrook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mamlok‐Naaman, Rachel, Ron Blonder, Jari Lavonen, Jack Holbrook, & Miia Rannikmäe. (2024). Supporting career awareness through job shadowing and industry site visits. Chemistry Teacher International. 7(1). 107–120.
2.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2023). THE RELEVANCE OF LEARNING OUTCOMES INCLUDED IN ESTONIAN GRADE 7-9 SCIENCE SUBJECT CURRICULA ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONCEPT OF ENERGY. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 22(4). 653–667.
3.
Soobard, Regina, et al.. (2022). Expanding disciplinary and interdisciplinary core idea maps by students to promote perceived self-efficacy in learning science. International Journal of STEM Education. 9(1). 57–57. 10 indexed citations
4.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2021). Exploring Students’ Science-Related Career Awareness Changes through Concept Maps. Education Sciences. 11(4). 157–157. 8 indexed citations
5.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2016). Identifying Characteristics of Science Teaching/Learning Materials Promoting Students' Intrinsic Relevance.. Science education international. 27(2). 194–216. 8 indexed citations
6.
Sormunen, Kari, Tuula Keinonen, & Jack Holbrook. (2014). Finnish Science Teachers' Views on the Three Stage Model.. Science education international. 25(2). 43–56. 1 indexed citations
7.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2014). The PROFILES Project Promoting Science Teaching in a Foreign Language. Science education international. 25(2). 78–96. 3 indexed citations
8.
Çavaş, Bülent, et al.. (2013). DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO DETERMINE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ IMPLEMENTATION OF INQUIRY BASED SCIENCE EDUCATION IN THEIR CLASSROOMS. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 2(2). 3 indexed citations
9.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2012). Evaluating the teaching impact of a prior, context-based, professional development programme. Science education international. 23(2). 166–185. 11 indexed citations
10.
Rannikmäe, Miia, et al.. (2011). Stakeholder Views on Attributes of Scientific Literacy Important for Future Citizens and Employees--A Delphi Study.. Science education international. 22(3). 202–217. 11 indexed citations
11.
Rannikmäe, Miia, et al.. (2010). Popularity and Relevance of Science Education Literacy: Using a Context-Based Approach.. Science education international. 21(2). 116–125. 24 indexed citations
12.
Holbrook, Jack. (2010). Education through Science as a Motivational Innovation for Science Education for All.. Science education international. 21(2). 80–91. 43 indexed citations
13.
Holbrook, Jack. (2009). Meeting Challenges to Sustainable Development through Science and Technology Education.. Science education international. 20. 44–59. 22 indexed citations
14.
Holbrook, Jack & Miia Rannikmäe. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 4(3). 275–288. 351 indexed citations
15.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2008). Teaching the PARSEL Way: Students' Reactions to Selected PARSEL Modules.. Science education international. 19(3). 303–312. 6 indexed citations
16.
Rannikmäe, Miia, et al.. (2006). THE NATURE OF SCIENCE AS VIEWED BY NON- SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 5(2). 8 indexed citations
17.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (2002). Science Education in Bhutan.. Science education international. 13(2). 30–36. 1 indexed citations
18.
Holbrook, Jack. (1999). Promoting Scientific and Technological Literacy through the Use of Supplementary Teaching Materials. 23. 197–198. 4 indexed citations
19.
Holbrook, Jack. (1998). Operationalising Scientific and Technological Literacy--A New Approach To Science Teaching.. Science education international. 9(2). 13–19. 28 indexed citations
20.
Holbrook, Jack, et al.. (1996). Creating Exemplary Teaching Materials To Enhance Scientific and Technological Literacy.. Science education international. 7(4). 3–7. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026