Ulrike E. Nett

2.2k citations
35 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 16

Ulrike E. Nett

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ulrike E. Nett
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 547
  • Social Psychology 617
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 459
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 296
  • Computer Science Applications 117
Replace Petra Barchfeld with:
Petra Barchfeld Germany
Kristina Loderer Germany
Kit S. Double Australia
David B. Miele United States
Elisabeth Vogl Germany
Chengchen Li China
Markku Niemivirta Finland
Douglas J. Hacker United States
Joachim Stiensmeier‐Pelster Germany
Carissa Romero United States
Ulrike E. Nett relative to Petra Barchfeld Germany Petra Barchfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Petra Barchfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike E. Nett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike E. Nett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike E. Nett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike E. Nett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike E. Nett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike E. Nett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike E. Nett. The network helps show where Ulrike E. Nett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulrike E. Nett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrike E. Nett Line = papers co-authored together Ulrike E. Nett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20246
2 20241
3 20243
4 20243
5 20237
6 20237
7 202240
8 202226
9 20217
10 201925
11 201957
12 2017138
13 20164
14 2013204
15
Types of students’ boredom : An experience-sampling approach
20121
16 20119
17
Attributional Retraining and Self-Esteem : "Robin Hood" Effects on Academic Achievement
20102
18
Students' and Teachers' Perspectives on the Antecedents of Boredom : An Interview Study
20101
19 20093
20 20084

About Ulrike E. Nett

Ulrike E. Nett is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mind wandering and attention (13 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (8 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (547 citations), Social Psychology (617 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (459 citations). Ulrike E. Nett has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Goetz, Nathan C. Hall, Anastasiya A. Lipnevich, Reinhard Pekrun, Lia M. Daniels, Melanie M. Keller, Tina Seufert, Anne C. Frenzel, Oliver Lüdtke and Robert H. Stupnisky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Learning and Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology and Learning and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026