Learning and Instruction

1.8k papers and 112.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Learning and Instruction in the last decades have received a total of 112.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Learning and Instruction usually cover Education (1.0k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.0k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (681 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (545 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (359 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (258 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Learning and Instruction are John Sweller, Richard E. Mayer, Stella Vosniadou, Monique Boekaerts, Shaaron Aınsworth, Andreas Krapp, David Kember, Richard Lowe, Alexander Renkl and Paul A. Kirschner.

In The Last Decade

Learning and Instruction

1.7k papers receiving 102.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Learning and Instruction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning and Instruction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning and Instruction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning and Instruction more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Learning and Instruction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning and Instruction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning and Instruction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026