Kit S. Double

2.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
37 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Kit S. Double is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kit S. Double has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kit S. Double's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (6 papers). Kit S. Double is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (6 papers). Kit S. Double collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Kit S. Double's co-authors include Damian P. Birney, Carolyn MacCann, Yixin Jiang, Amirali Minbashian, Micaela Bucich, Therese N. Hopfenbeck, Joshua A. McGrane, S. Walker, Susan Colmar and Luca Ronconi and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Kit S. Double

34 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A m... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 2019 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kit S. Double Australia 14 460 459 341 257 245 37 1.3k
Petra Barchfeld Germany 7 764 1.7× 575 1.3× 441 1.3× 632 2.5× 250 1.0× 9 1.7k
Μαρία Πλατσίδου Greece 16 289 0.6× 271 0.6× 372 1.1× 219 0.9× 141 0.6× 36 983
Kristina Loderer Germany 12 453 1.0× 365 0.8× 295 0.9× 515 2.0× 164 0.7× 13 1.1k
Ulrike E. Nett Germany 16 617 1.3× 466 1.0× 296 0.9× 547 2.1× 459 1.9× 35 1.4k
Marci S. DeCaro United States 15 269 0.6× 345 0.8× 517 1.5× 505 2.0× 362 1.5× 49 1.4k
Alexander P. Burgoyne United States 16 592 1.3× 320 0.7× 334 1.0× 758 2.9× 249 1.0× 39 1.4k
Ciping Deng China 19 298 0.6× 483 1.1× 341 1.0× 229 0.9× 211 0.9× 45 1.2k
Susanna Siu‐sze Yeung Hong Kong 20 230 0.5× 278 0.6× 443 1.3× 101 0.4× 175 0.7× 73 958
Naomi J. Aldrich United States 10 118 0.3× 656 1.4× 516 1.5× 274 1.1× 109 0.4× 15 1.2k
Albert Ziegler Germany 23 552 1.2× 746 1.6× 451 1.3× 727 2.8× 71 0.3× 88 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Kit S. Double

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kit S. Double's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kit S. Double with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kit S. Double more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kit S. Double

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kit S. Double. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kit S. Double. The network helps show where Kit S. Double may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kit S. Double

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kit S. Double. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kit S. Double based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kit S. Double. Kit S. Double is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Double, Kit S., Dominic M. D. Tran, & Micah B. Goldwater. (2025). Judgments of learning impair rule-based discovery. Memory & Cognition. 54(1). 45–58.
2.
Kim, Lisa E., et al.. (2025). When good results mislead: How positive student outcomes lead teachers to overestimate the effectiveness of their assistance. International Journal of Educational Research. 133. 102719–102719. 1 indexed citations
3.
MacCann, Carolyn, Kit S. Double, Sally Olderbak, et al.. (2025). What do we do to help others feel better? The eight strategies of the Regulating Others’ Emotions Scale (ROES).. Emotion. 25(2). 410–429. 2 indexed citations
4.
Double, Kit S., Micah B. Goldwater, & Damian P. Birney. (2025). Reactivity to confidence ratings: evidence of impaired rule-learning. Metacognition and Learning. 20(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Double, Kit S.. (2025). Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false. Behavior Research Methods. 57(3). 97–97.
6.
7.
Double, Kit S. & Damian P. Birney. (2024). Confidence judgments interfere with perceptual decision making. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 14133–14133. 1 indexed citations
8.
Walker, S., et al.. (2024). It’s what I think you do that matters: Comparing self, partner, and shared perspectives of what a romantic partner does to regulate your emotions. European Journal of Personality. 39(3). 377–391. 1 indexed citations
9.
Double, Kit S., Rebecca T. Pinkus, James J. Gross, & Carolyn MacCann. (2023). Emotion regulation efficacy beliefs: The outsized impact of base rates.. Emotion. 24(1). 234–240. 2 indexed citations
10.
Double, Kit S.. (2023). Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?. Journal of Intelligence. 11(10). 203–203. 4 indexed citations
11.
MacCann, Carolyn, et al.. (2022). Lower Avoidant Coping Mediates the Relationship of Emotional Intelligence With Well-Being and Ill-Being. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 835819–835819. 10 indexed citations
12.
Double, Kit S., Rebecca T. Pinkus, & Carolyn MacCann. (2022). Emotionally intelligent people show more flexible regulation of emotions in daily life.. Emotion. 22(2). 397–402. 16 indexed citations
13.
Walker, S., et al.. (2021). Emotional intelligence and attachment in adulthood: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 184. 111174–111174. 31 indexed citations
14.
Double, Kit S. & Damian P. Birney. (2019). Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2755–2755. 55 indexed citations
15.
MacCann, Carolyn, et al.. (2019). Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis.. Psychological Bulletin. 146(2). 150–186. 506 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Double, Kit S., Joshua A. McGrane, & Therese N. Hopfenbeck. (2019). The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies. Educational Psychology Review. 32(2). 481–509. 226 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Double, Kit S. & Damian P. Birney. (2019). Do confidence ratings prime confidence?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(3). 1035–1042. 17 indexed citations
18.
Double, Kit S., et al.. (2019). The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension. British Educational Research Journal. 45(6). 1220–1234. 18 indexed citations
19.
Double, Kit S. & Damian P. Birney. (2017). The interplay between self-evaluation, goal orientation, and self-efficacy on performance and learning. Cognitive Science. 4 indexed citations
20.
Franceschini, Sandro, Luca Ronconi, Sara Bertoni, et al.. (2017). Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 5863–5863. 123 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026