Contemporary Educational Psychology
About
In The Last Decade
Contemporary Educational Psychology
1.8k papers receiving 98.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Contemporary Educational Psychology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Educational Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Educational Psychology.
Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Educational Psychology
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Educational Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Educational Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Educational Psychology more than expected).
- Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)
- Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (2000)
- Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions (2020)
- Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn (2000)
- Assessing Metacognitive Awareness (1994)
- Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ) (2010)
- Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know (1996)
- Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Mathematical Problem-Solving of Gifted Students (1996)
- Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman? (2012)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.