Thomas Fauster
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Physiology top 5%
- Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
Papers in
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 10
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 2
- Food Science 10
- Food Drying and Modeling 3
- Radiation Effects and Dosimetry 2
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Henry Jaeger (9 shared papers)Paola Pittia (1 shared paper)Marco Dalla Rosa (2 shared papers)Santina Romani (2 shared papers)Cinzia Mannozzi (2 shared papers)Urszula Tylewicz (2 shared papers)Felix Teufel (1 shared paper)Robin Ostermeier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Food and Bioprocess Technology (2 papers)Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (2 papers)European Food Research and Technology (2 papers)Applied Sciences (1 paper)Food Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustriaCzechiaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Fauster
13 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Biotechnology 225
- Physiology 73
- Biochemistry 91
- Food Science 257
- Nutrition and Dietetics 69
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Fauster
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Fauster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Fauster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Fauster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Fauster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Fauster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Fauster. The network helps show where Thomas Fauster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Fauster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 0 |
About Thomas Fauster
Thomas Fauster is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Food Science, Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Inactivation Methods (10 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (3 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (3 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (3 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (2 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers) and Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (225 citations), Physiology (73 citations), Biochemistry (91 citations), Food Science (257 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (69 citations). Thomas Fauster has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Czechia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Henry Jaeger, Paola Pittia, Marco Dalla Rosa, Santina Romani, Cinzia Mannozzi, Urszula Tylewicz, Felix Teufel, Robin Ostermeier, F.-W. Rath and Stefan Toepfl. Their work appears in journals such as Food and Bioprocess Technology, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, European Food Research and Technology, Applied Sciences and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.