Applied Sciences

65.8k papers and 522.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 65.8k papers published in Applied Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 522.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Sciences usually cover Civil and Structural Engineering (8.6k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (8.5k papers) and Mechanical Engineering (8.3k papers) specifically the topics of Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (1.3k papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (1.3k papers) and Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Sciences are Jong-Myon Kim, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Hongyu Liu, Bo Lang, Yosoon Choi, R. Ellahi, Robertas Damaševičius, Kanji Ono, Hongxiang Teng and Jian Zhou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025