Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity
20042.0k citationsDouwe Beijaard, Paulien C. Meijer et al.Teaching and Teacher Educationprofile →
Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective
2000746 citationsDouwe Beijaard, Nico Verloop et al.Teaching and Teacher Educationprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Nico Verloop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nico Verloop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nico Verloop more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nico Verloop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nico Verloop. The network helps show where Nico Verloop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nico Verloop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nico Verloop.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nico Verloop based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nico Verloop. Nico Verloop is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tartwijk, Jan van, et al.. (2013). Persoonlijkheid, self-efficacy, disciplineringsstrategieën en de leerkracht-leerlingrelatie bij leerkrachten in opleiding. Pedagogische Studiën. 90(1). 21–39.1 indexed citations
Beijaard, Douwe, et al.. (2011). Reconsiderando a pesquisa sobre identidade profissional de professores. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 3–45.1 indexed citations
Oolbekkink-Marchand, Helma, Jan van Driel, & Nico Verloop. (2007). Een vergelijking van de perspectieven van docenten in het voortgezet en wetenschappelijk onderwijs op onderwijzen en leren in de context van onderwijsvernieuwingen.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 84(4). 293–307.4 indexed citations
12.
Verloop, Nico & Joseph Kessels. (2006). Opleidingskunde: Ontwikkelingen rond het opleiden en leren van professionals in onderwijs en bedrijfsleven. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 83. 301–321.6 indexed citations
13.
Henze, Ineke, Jan van Driel, & Nico Verloop. (2005). De praktijkkennis van ervaren bètadocenten in de context van de invoering van het vak Algemene Natuurwetenschappen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 82(1). 59–76.2 indexed citations
14.
Driel, Jan van, Onno De Jong, & Nico Verloop. (2004). De Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) van scheikundedocenten-in-opleiding over het gebruik van deeltjesmodellen. Pedagogische Studiën. 81(4). 273–289.1 indexed citations
15.
Beijaard, Douwe, Paulien C. Meijer, & Nico Verloop. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education. 20(2). 107–128.1990 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Beijaard, Douwe, et al.. (2002). Het portfolio als reflectie-instrument voor docenten-in-opleiding. Pedagogische Studiën. 79(4). 269–286.6 indexed citations
17.
Verloop, Nico, Jan van Driel, & Paulien C. Meijer. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching.. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 6(1). 21–38.4 indexed citations
Akker, Jan van den & Nico Verloop. (1994). Curriculum Evaluation in the Netherlands.. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 20(4). 419–534.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.