Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Chudowsky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Chudowsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Chudowsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Chudowsky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Chudowsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Chudowsky. The network helps show where Naomi Chudowsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Chudowsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Chudowsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Chudowsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Chudowsky. Naomi Chudowsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feuer, Michael J., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of Teacher Preparation Programs: Purposes, Methods, and Policy Options..75 indexed citations
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2012). Civic Education and Charter Schools: Current Knowledge and Future Research Issues..2 indexed citations
4.
Chudowsky, Naomi & Alan Ginsburg. (2012). Who Attends Charter Schools and How Are Those Students Doing? Exploratory Analysis of NAEP Data..
5.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2011). State Test Score Trends through 2008-09, Part 3: Student Achievement at 8th Grade..2 indexed citations
6.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2010). State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 5: Are There Differences in Achievement between Boys and Girls?..6 indexed citations
7.
Kober, Nancy, et al.. (2010). State Test Score Trends through 2008-09, Part 2: Slow and Uneven Progress in Narrowing Gaps..10 indexed citations
8.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2010). State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 6: Has Progress Been Made in Raising Achievement for English Language Learners?..3 indexed citations
9.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2010). State Test Score Trends through 2008-09, Part 1: Rising Scores on State Tests and NAEP..4 indexed citations
10.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2009). State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?..4 indexed citations
11.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2009). State Test Score Trends through 2007-08. Part 1: Is the Emphasis on "Proficiency" Shortchanging Higher- and Lower-Achieving Students?..2 indexed citations
12.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2009). State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 4: Has Progress Been Made in Raising Achievement for Students with Disabilities?..8 indexed citations
13.
Kober, Nancy, et al.. (2009). An Early Look at the Economic Stimulus Package and the Public Schools: Perspectives from State Leaders..1 indexed citations
14.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2008). Many States Have Taken a "Backloaded" Approach to No Child Left Behind Goal of All Students Scoring "Proficient"..11 indexed citations
15.
Kober, Nancy, et al.. (2008). Has Student Achievement Increased since 2002? State Test Score Trends through 2006-07..16 indexed citations
16.
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2007). Answering the Question that Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased since No Child Left Behind?..24 indexed citations
Chudowsky, Naomi, et al.. (2003). Effects of High School Exit Exams on Dropout Rates: Summary of a Panel Discussion.. 149(15-18). 1718–22.2 indexed citations
19.
Rentner, Diane Stark, et al.. (2003). From the Capital to the Classroom: State and Federal Efforts To Implement the No Child Left Behind Act.. 61(3). 10–3.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.