Douglas Huffman

1.5k total citations
45 papers, 980 citations indexed

About

Douglas Huffman is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Douglas Huffman has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 980 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Education, 10 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 10 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Douglas Huffman's work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (10 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers). Douglas Huffman is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (10 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers). Douglas Huffman collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Douglas Huffman's co-authors include Frances Lawrenz, Patricia Heller, Kelli Thomas, Jacqueline Hughes, Aaron Doering, Wayne W. Welch, Taehee Noh, M. Michlin, Fred Goldberg and Amy Gravely and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Douglas Huffman

43 papers receiving 790 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Douglas Huffman 676 269 109 97 94 45 980
Drew H. Gitomer 1.3k 1.9× 408 1.5× 99 0.9× 194 2.0× 64 0.7× 67 1.7k
Alicia C. Alonzo 919 1.4× 442 1.6× 47 0.4× 64 0.7× 50 0.5× 34 1.1k
Gail P. Baxter 1.0k 1.5× 591 2.2× 261 2.4× 124 1.3× 52 0.6× 36 1.5k
M. Suzanne Donovan 730 1.1× 324 1.2× 38 0.3× 70 0.7× 64 0.7× 12 1.1k
Naomi Chudowsky 980 1.4× 393 1.5× 96 0.9× 177 1.8× 23 0.2× 29 1.3k
Jeanne Century 1.2k 1.7× 565 2.1× 48 0.4× 74 0.8× 164 1.7× 16 1.6k
Britte Haugan Cheng 490 0.7× 261 1.0× 73 0.7× 182 1.9× 24 0.3× 12 845
Iris R. Weiss 1.2k 1.8× 384 1.4× 28 0.3× 90 0.9× 398 4.2× 40 1.5k
George W. Bright 850 1.3× 258 1.0× 40 0.4× 52 0.5× 21 0.2× 88 1.4k
Anthony J. Nitko 763 1.1× 207 0.8× 99 0.9× 55 0.6× 15 0.2× 29 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Huffman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Huffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Huffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Huffman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Huffman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Huffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Huffman. The network helps show where Douglas Huffman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Huffman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Huffman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Huffman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Huffman. Douglas Huffman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huffman, Douglas. (2016). The Kingdom According to Luke and Acts: A Social, Literary, and Theological Introduction. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 59(3). 628. 4 indexed citations
2.
Huffman, Douglas, et al.. (2014). Integrating nanoscience and technology in the high school science classroom. Nanotechnology Reviews. 4(1). 4 indexed citations
3.
Lawrenz, Frances, et al.. (2009). Evaluation Capacity Building in the Schools: Administrator-Led and Teacher-Led Perspectives. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 23(3). 61–82. 10 indexed citations
4.
Huffman, Douglas, Kelli Thomas, & Frances Lawrenz. (2008). A Collaborative Immersio Approach to Evaluation Capacity Building. American Journal of Evaluation. 29(3). 358–368. 32 indexed citations
5.
Huffman, Douglas & Kelli Thomas. (2008). Collaborative Inquiry and Data-Based Decision Making. 2 indexed citations
6.
Lawrenz, Frances, Douglas Huffman, & J. Randy McGinnis. (2007). Multilevel evaluation process use in large‐scale multisite evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2007(116). 75–85. 3 indexed citations
7.
Lawrenz, Frances & Douglas Huffman. (2006). Methodological pluralism: The gold standard of STEM evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2006(109). 19–34. 13 indexed citations
8.
Lawrenz, Frances, et al.. (2006). Viewing the school environment through multiple lenses: In search of school-level variables tied to student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 43(3). 237–254. 24 indexed citations
9.
Lawrenz, Frances, et al.. (2005). Enhancing the Instructional Environment: Optimal Learning in Introductory Science Classes. The journal of college science teaching. 34(7). 40. 17 indexed citations
10.
Noh, Taehee, et al.. (2005). The Effects of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving on High School Students' Chemistry Problem-Solving Performance and Verbal Interactions. Journal of Chemical Education. 82(10). 1558–1558. 27 indexed citations
11.
Lawrenz, Frances & Douglas Huffman. (2004). Using Multi-Site Core Evaluation to Provide “Scientific” Evidence. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 19(2). 17–36. 2 indexed citations
12.
Doering, Aaron, Jacqueline Hughes, & Douglas Huffman. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education. 35. 342–361. 111 indexed citations
13.
Huffman, Douglas, Fred Goldberg, & M. Michlin. (2003). Using Computers to Create Constructivist Learning Environments: Impact on Pedagogy and Achievement. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 22(2). 151–168. 24 indexed citations
14.
Lawrenz, Frances & Douglas Huffman. (2003). How Can Multi-Site Evaluations be Participatory?. American Journal of Evaluation. 24(4). 471–482. 28 indexed citations
15.
Lawrenz, Frances & Douglas Huffman. (2002). The Archipelago Approach To Mixed Method Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 23(3). 331–338. 16 indexed citations
16.
Lawrenz, Frances & Douglas Huffman. (1999). Evaluating the Long Term Effect of Teacher Enhancement. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 2 indexed citations
17.
Welch, Wayne W., Douglas Huffman, & Frances Lawrenz. (1998). The precision of data obtained in large-scale science assessments: An investigation of bootstrapping and half-sample replication methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(6). 697–704. 3 indexed citations
18.
Huffman, Douglas, et al.. (1997). Within-class analysis of ninth-grade science students' perceptions of the learning environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(8). 791–804. 12 indexed citations
19.
Huffman, Douglas. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students' problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(6). 551–570. 71 indexed citations
20.
Heller, Patricia & Douglas Huffman. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun. The Physics Teacher. 33(8). 503–503. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026