Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47579448 →Countries where authors are citing Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
This map shows the geographic impact of Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
This network shows the impact of Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment.
About Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
This paper, published in 2013, received 914 indexed citations . Written by James W. Pellegrino, Naomi Chudowsky and Robert Glaser covering the research area of Information Systems and Management and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (645 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (293 citations) and Information Systems and Management (97 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47579448.