Theory Into Practice
About
In The Last Decade
Theory Into Practice
1.8k papers receiving 50.3k citations
Fields of papers published in Theory Into Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory Into Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory Into Practice.
Countries where authors publish in Theory Into Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory Into Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory Into Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory Into Practice more than expected).
- Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)
- Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms (1992)
- A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview (2002)
- Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview (2002)
- But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy (1995)
- Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st Century Classroom (2008)
- Rote Versus Meaningful Learning (2002)
- Developing Cultural Critical Consciousness and Self-Reflection in Preservice Teacher Education (2003)
- Moral development: A review of the theory (1977)
- An attainable global perspective (1982)
- Beyond assumptions: Shifting the limits of action research (1990)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.