Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Qualitative research in psychology
1986444 citationsMariane Hedegaard et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mariane Hedegaard
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mariane Hedegaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mariane Hedegaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mariane Hedegaard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mariane Hedegaard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mariane Hedegaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mariane Hedegaard. The network helps show where Mariane Hedegaard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mariane Hedegaard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mariane Hedegaard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mariane Hedegaard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mariane Hedegaard. Mariane Hedegaard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hedegaard, Mariane & Anne Edwards. (2014). Transitions and children's learning. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 3(3). 185–187.7 indexed citations
Hedegaard, Mariane. (2012). A cultural-historical theory of children's development. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).15 indexed citations
Fleer, Marilyn, Mariane Hedegaard, & Jonathan Tudge. (2009). Childhood studies and the impact of globalization : policies and practices at global and local levels. Routledge eBooks.48 indexed citations
15.
Hedegaard, Mariane, et al.. (2008). Researching child development - an introduction. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 1–9.2 indexed citations
16.
Hedegaard, Mariane & Seth Chaiklin. (2005). Radical-local teaching and learning: a cultural-historical approach. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).75 indexed citations
17.
Hedegaard, Mariane. (2001). Learning in Classrooms: A Cultural-Historical Approach. publish.UP (University of Potsdam).24 indexed citations
18.
Chaiklin, Seth, Mariane Hedegaard, & Uffe Juul Jensen. (1999). Activity Theory and Social Practice Cultural-Historical Approaches. Aarhus University Press eBooks.193 indexed citations
19.
Martín, Laura Miraut, Laura Miraut Martín, Roy Pea, et al.. (1995). Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge University Press eBooks.18 indexed citations
20.
Hedegaard, Mariane, Pentti Hakkarainen, & Yrjö Engeström. (1984). Learning and teaching on a scientific basis : methodological and epistemological aspects of the activity theory of learning and teaching. Medical Entomology and Zoology.22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.