María Eugenia Arias
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Communication top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Stephen W NasonColette A. FrayneYan HuoJohn MillimanKevin B. LoweHugh ScullionJ. Michael GeringerMark C. Butler
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper)Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementCommunicationManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademy of Management JournalOrganizational Behavior Teaching Review
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaCosta RicaUnited States
In The Last Decade
María Eugenia Arias
5 papers receiving 155 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 82
- Strategy and Management 47
- Communication 47
- Sociology and Political Science 32
- Social Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by María Eugenia Arias
This map shows the geographic impact of María Eugenia Arias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María Eugenia Arias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María Eugenia Arias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by María Eugenia Arias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María Eugenia Arias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María Eugenia Arias. The network helps show where María Eugenia Arias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of María Eugenia Arias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María Eugenia Arias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María Eugenia Arias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with María Eugenia Arias. María Eugenia Arias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Cultura y liderazgo organizacional en 10 países de América Latina. El estudio Globe | 23 |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 114 |
About María Eugenia Arias
María Eugenia Arias is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 7 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper) and Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (82 citations), Communication (47 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (25 citations). María Eugenia Arias has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Costa Rica and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W Nason, Colette A. Frayne, Yan Huo, John Milliman, Kevin B. Lowe, Hugh Scullion, J. Michael Geringer, Mark C. Butler, David E. Bowen and Mary B. Teagarden. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academy of Management Journal and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.