Klodiana Lanaj
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Russell E. JohnsonChristopher M. BarnesChu‐Hsiang ChangJoel KoopmanBrent A. ScottJohn R. HollenbeckMo WangTrevor Foulk
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (21 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers)Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Klodiana Lanaj
43 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.3k
- Social Psychology 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Applied Psychology 841
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 554
Countries citing papers authored by Klodiana Lanaj
This map shows the geographic impact of Klodiana Lanaj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klodiana Lanaj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klodiana Lanaj more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Klodiana Lanaj
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klodiana Lanaj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klodiana Lanaj. The network helps show where Klodiana Lanaj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klodiana Lanaj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klodiana Lanaj. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klodiana Lanaj based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klodiana Lanaj. Klodiana Lanaj is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 73 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 82 | |
| 17 | 64 | |
| 18 | 98 | |
| 19 | 232 | |
| 20 | Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis.breakdown → | 502 |
About Klodiana Lanaj
Klodiana Lanaj is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (21 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.3k citations), Applied Psychology (841 citations) and Social Psychology (1.5k citations). Klodiana Lanaj has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Russell E. Johnson, Christopher M. Barnes, Chu‐Hsiang Chang, Joel Koopman, Brent A. Scott, John R. Hollenbeck, Mo Wang, Trevor Foulk, Amir Erez and Stephanie M. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Academy of Management Journal and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.