Khalil Khan
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Food Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Elżbieta GujskaL. R. JoppaN. D. WilliamsRafael BorneoZ. CzarneckiWei WangŞenay ŞimşekGary A. Hareland
- Topics
- Food composition and properties (17 papers)Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (8 papers)Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTrends in Food Science & TechnologyTheoretical and Applied Genetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesPoland
In The Last Decade
Khalil Khan
22 papers receiving 607 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Nutrition and Dietetics 407
- Food Science 312
- Plant Science 304
- Biomedical Engineering 84
- Molecular Biology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Khalil Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Khalil Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khalil Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khalil Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Khalil Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khalil Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khalil Khan. The network helps show where Khalil Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Khalil Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Khalil Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Khalil Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Khalil Khan. Khalil Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Süne (Eurygaster spp) Hasarlı Buğdayların Bazı Protein Fraksiyonları ve Farinogram Değerleri Üzerine Buharla Tavlamanın Etkileri | 1 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | Assessing spring wheat quality using the glutograph instrument. | 6 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Effect of extrusion variables on amino acids, available lysine and in vitro protein digestibility of the extrudates from pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) | 4 |
| 6 | Instrumental, sensory and microbiological evaluation of flavoured pinto bean [Phaseolus vulgaris] extrudates | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 112 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 104 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About Khalil Khan
Khalil Khan is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Gastroenterology and Food Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (17 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (8 papers) and Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (407 citations), Food Science (312 citations) and Plant Science (304 citations). Khalil Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Elżbieta Gujska, L. R. Joppa, N. D. Williams, Rafael Borneo, Z. Czarnecki, Wei Wang, Şenay Şimşek, Gary A. Hareland, Shiaoman Chao and Toi J. Tsilo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Trends in Food Science & Technology and Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.