Philippines

48.0k papers and 901.3k indexed citations i.

About

In recent decades scholars affiliated with institutions in Philippines have published 48.0k papers, which have received a total of 901.3k indexed citations. Scholars in Philippines publish mostly in Plant Science (6.3k papers), Molecular Biology (3.4k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (3.4k papers) and are cited by scholars working on Plant Science (220.4k citations), Molecular Biology (91.0k citations) and Ecology (67.9k citations). Scholars in Philippines collaborate with scholars from United States, Japan and China. Scholars in Philippines have published in prestigous journals including Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing works of authors working in Philippines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by authors working at institutions in Philippines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by authors working at institutions in Philippines. The network helps show where authors in Philippines may publish in the future.

Countries collaborating with authors based in Philippines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by institutions in Philippines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers from institutions in Philippines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore countries with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025