Countries citing papers authored by Jill Fielding-Wells
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Fielding-Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Fielding-Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Fielding-Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Fielding-Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Fielding-Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Fielding-Wells. The network helps show where Jill Fielding-Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Fielding-Wells
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Fielding-Wells.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Fielding-Wells based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Fielding-Wells. Jill Fielding-Wells is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fielding-Wells, Jill. (2016). "Mathematics Is Just 1 + 1 = 2, What Is There to Argue About?": Developing a Framework for Argument-Based Mathematical Inquiry.. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 214–221.3 indexed citations
11.
O’Brien, Mia, et al.. (2015). How Inquiry Pedagogy Enables Teachers to Facilitate Growth Mindsets in Mathematics Classrooms.. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 469–476.4 indexed citations
12.
Fielding-Wells, Jill. (2015). Identifying core elements of argument-based inquiry in primary mathematics learning. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 229–236.6 indexed citations
13.
Fielding-Wells, Jill & Katie Makar. (2015). "If it doesn't have an apex it's not a pyramid": Argumentation as a bridge to mathematical reasoning. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
14.
Beswick, Kim, Tracey Muir, & Jill Fielding-Wells. (2015). Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).28 indexed citations
15.
Fielding-Wells, Jill. (2014). Labour Subcontracting in the Construction Industries of Developing Countries: An Assessment from Two Perspectives. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
16.
Coupland, Sarah E., Bertil Damato, Helen Kalirai, et al.. (2013). A comparison of gene expression profiling versus multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in metastatic risk prediction in choroidal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 4218–4218.1 indexed citations
17.
Fielding-Wells, Jill. (2013). Inquiry-based argumentation in primary mathematics: Reflecting on evidence. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1. 290–297.6 indexed citations
18.
Fielding-Wells, Jill & Katie Makar. (2012). Developing primary students' argumentation skills in inquiry based mathematics classrooms. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2. 149–153.6 indexed citations
19.
Fielding-Wells, Jill & Katie Makar. (2008). Using mathematical inquiry to engage student learning within the overall curriculum. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
20.
Fielding-Wells, Jill & Katie Makar. (2008). Student (dis)engagement in mathematics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1–10.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.