This map shows the geographic impact of Mia O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mia O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mia O’Brien more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mia O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mia O’Brien. The network helps show where Mia O’Brien may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mia O’Brien
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mia O’Brien.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mia O’Brien based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mia O’Brien. Mia O’Brien is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
O’Brien, Mia, et al.. (2017). My best possible learning self: Primary school children's perspectives on happiness and success in the classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning.2 indexed citations
4.
Hillman, Judith, et al.. (2016). Assessing Children's Progress in Taking Intellectual Risks in a Mathematical Inquiry Classroom with a Positive Learning Approach.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).5 indexed citations
5.
O’Brien, Mia, et al.. (2015). How Inquiry Pedagogy Enables Teachers to Facilitate Growth Mindsets in Mathematics Classrooms.. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 469–476.4 indexed citations
Bulmer, Michael, et al.. (2012). The impact of classroom design on collaborative learning. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 11. 7–13.
9.
Hilton, Geoff, et al.. (2012). Evaluating middle years students' proportional reasoning. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 330–337.8 indexed citations
10.
Bulmer, Michael, et al.. (2012). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge in a secondlevel mathematics course. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).7 indexed citations
Bulmer, Michael, et al.. (2007). A research orientated, technology-rich, collaborative learning design: meeting the challenge in a large first year class. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 16. 1–11.
16.
Bulmer, Michael, et al.. (2007). Troublesome concepts in statistics: a student perspective on what they are and how to learn them. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). 9–15.5 indexed citations
17.
Jamieson, Peter, et al.. (2004). Building Learning Communities: Constructing Appropriate Teaching and Learning Spaces.1 indexed citations
18.
O’Brien, Mia, et al.. (2002). From national identity to global citizenship: challenges for citizenship education in Australia. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 17(1). 31–40.5 indexed citations
O’Brien, Mia & Gerard Ledwich. (1985). Placement of static compensators for stability improvement. IEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution [see also IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution]. 132(1). 30–35.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.