Applied Mathematics

571.0k papers and 8.0M indexed citations i.

About

571.0k papers covering Applied Mathematics have received a total of 8.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory, Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis and Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis and also cover the fields of Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology. Some of the most active scholars covering Applied Mathematics are David L. Donoho, Stéphane Mallat, Igor Podlubný, Philip L. Roe, Stanley Osher, J. A. Nelder, R. Mead, A. Pazy, Chi‐Wang Shu and Haïm Brézis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Applied Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Applied Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Applied Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Applied Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Applied Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Applied Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025