Countries citing papers authored by Gail E. FitzSimons
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gail E. FitzSimons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail E. FitzSimons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail E. FitzSimons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gail E. FitzSimons
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail E. FitzSimons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail E. FitzSimons. The network helps show where Gail E. FitzSimons may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail E. FitzSimons
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail E. FitzSimons.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail E. FitzSimons based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gail E. FitzSimons. Gail E. FitzSimons is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stacey, Kaye, et al.. (2012). Reasoning: A Dog's tale. The Australian mathematics teacher. 68(3). 22–26.3 indexed citations
6.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2008). Mathematics and numeracy: Divergence and convergence in education and work. 197–218.2 indexed citations
7.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2007). Integrating ICT into adult mathematics education: an activity theoretical approach. 137–145.1 indexed citations
8.
FitzSimons, Gail E., et al.. (2005). Learning Numeracy on the Job: A Case Study of Chemical Handling and Spraying. An Adult Literacy National Project Report.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.6 indexed citations
9.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2005). Numeracy and Australian Workplaces: Findings and Implications.. 19(2). 27–40.11 indexed citations
10.
FitzSimons, Gail E., et al.. (2005). Learning numeracy on the job: a case study of chemical handling and spraying.13 indexed citations
11.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2004). Developing Vocational Expertise: Principles and Issues in Vocational Education [Book Review]. International Journal of Training Research. 2(2). 87.1 indexed citations
12.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2003). Using Engestrm's expansive learning framework to analyse a case study in adult mathematics education. 12(2). 47–63.3 indexed citations
13.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (2002). An Expansive Learning Approach to Mathematics Education for Parents: An Australian Case Study..
14.
Seah, Wee Tiong, Alan J. Bishop, Gail E. FitzSimons, & Philip Clarkson. (2001). Exploring Issues of Control Over Values Teaching in the Mathematics Classroom.14 indexed citations
Coben, Diana, John O’Donoghue, & Gail E. FitzSimons. (2000). Perspectives on adults learning mathematics : research and practice. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).29 indexed citations
17.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (1998). The institution of mathematics in vocational education and training. 79–88.2 indexed citations
18.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (1998). New times for mathematics in vocational education and training. 194–200.
19.
FitzSimons, Gail E.. (1997). Researching perspectives on vocational mathematics.1 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Lesley H., Léonie J. Rennie, Barry J. Fraser, & Gail E. FitzSimons. (1996). Gender, Science and Mathematics: Shortening the Shadow. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.44 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.