Countries citing papers authored by Léonie J. Rennie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Léonie J. Rennie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Léonie J. Rennie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Léonie J. Rennie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Léonie J. Rennie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Léonie J. Rennie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Léonie J. Rennie. The network helps show where Léonie J. Rennie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Léonie J. Rennie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Léonie J. Rennie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Léonie J. Rennie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Léonie J. Rennie. Léonie J. Rennie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rennie, Léonie J., Grady Venville, & John W. Wallace. (2012). Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Reflections, and Ways Forward. Teaching and Learning in Science Series..1 indexed citations
Rennie, Léonie J., et al.. (2010). Do-It-Yourself Astronomy: Getting the Best out of a Science Kit.. eSpace (Curtin University). 56(4). 13–17.1 indexed citations
6.
Rennie, Léonie J.. (2010). Gender Still Matters in Australian Schooling. eSpace (Curtin University). 2(1). 100–111.5 indexed citations
7.
Rennie, Léonie J., et al.. (2009). Promoting understanding of, and teaching about, scientific literacy in primary schools.. eSpace (Curtin University). 55(2). 25–30.4 indexed citations
8.
Howitt, Christine, et al.. (2009). The Scientists in Schools Project. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 55(1). 35–38.11 indexed citations
Rennie, Léonie J., et al.. (2002). Using Enrichment and Extracurricular Activities to Influence Secondary Students' Interest and Participation in Science. 1(4).6 indexed citations
11.
Wallace, John W., et al.. (2001). The Rocket Project: An interdisciplinary activity for low achievers. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 57(1). 6–11.3 indexed citations
12.
Hackling, Mark, Denis Goodrum, & Léonie J. Rennie. (2001). The state of science in Australian secondary schools. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 47(4).37 indexed citations
13.
Venville, Grady, et al.. (1999). Building Bridges Across the Disciplines: Learning Science Through Technology. 4(1).4 indexed citations
14.
Rennie, Léonie J.. (1998). Improving the Interpretation and Reporting of Quantitative Research.. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(3).34 indexed citations
15.
Rennie, Léonie J.. (1998). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Western Australian Science Education Association (23rd, Perth, Western Australia, November 13, 1998)..1 indexed citations
16.
Rennie, Léonie J. & Lesley H. Parker. (1996). Placing Physics Problems in Real-Life Context: Students' Reactions and Performance.. Australian science teachers journal. 42(1). 55–59.47 indexed citations
17.
Parker, Lesley H., Léonie J. Rennie, Barry J. Fraser, & Gail E. FitzSimons. (1996). Gender, Science and Mathematics: Shortening the Shadow. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.44 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.