Journal of Intercultural Studies

1.1k papers and 9.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (702 papers), Demography (213 papers) and Education (145 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (214 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (171 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (160 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Intercultural Studies are Greg Noble, Loretta Baldassar, Sirma Bilge, Amanda Wise, Scott Poynting, Zlatko Skrbiš, Stephen Castles, Tariq Modood, Nasar Meer and Anita Harris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Intercultural Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Intercultural Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Intercultural Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Intercultural Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025