David L. Ford

37 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

David L. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 334
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Social Psychology 216
  • Gender Studies 82
  • Strategy and Management 103
Replace Steve Williams with:
Steve Williams United States
Daniel J. Svyantek United States
Asya Pazy Israel
Jürgen Weibler Germany
John E. Dittrich United States
Harold Lazarus United States
Jon Aarum Andersen Sweden
Jennifer D. Bragger United States
Charles H. Fay United States
Harry W. Hennessey United States
David L. Ford relative to Steve Williams United States Steve Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Steve Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Ford. The network helps show where David L. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David L. Ford Line = papers co-authored together David L. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020115
2 201862
3 197758
4 201056
5 197155
6 200240
7 197640
8 196939
9
Organizational stress, personal life stress and symptoms of life strains: An inquiry into the moderating role of styles of coping.
199132
10 201231
11 201229
12 200928
13 198522
14 197621
15 198318
16 200616
17 201114
18 201812
19 197211
20 200110

About David L. Ford

David L. Ford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Communication, having authored 40 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (334 citations), General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Social Psychology (216 citations), Gender Studies (82 citations) and Strategy and Management (103 citations). David L. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Orlando C. Richard, George W. Huber, Kiran M. Ismail, Harold Brown, Rabi S. Bhagat, Paul M. Nemiroff, Hao Chen, William A. Pasmore, Tejinder K. Billing and Balaji Krishnan. Their work appears in journals such as Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Applied Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Review and Decision Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact