Asia Pacific Journal of Management

1.4k papers and 46.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management in the last decades have received a total of 46.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management usually cover Strategy and Management (609 papers), Accounting (463 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (458 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (417 papers), International Business and FDI (317 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (231 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia Pacific Journal of Management are John A. Mathews, Mike W. Peng, Geert Hofstede, David Ahlström, Anne S. Tsui, Klaus E. Meyer, John H. Dunning, Michael Carney, Chao C. Chen and Peter Ping Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Journal of Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Journal of Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025