Steve Williams

1.2k total citations
26 papers, 734 citations indexed

About

Steve Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Accounting and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Williams has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 734 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Accounting and 4 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Steve Williams's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). Steve Williams is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). Steve Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Steve Williams's co-authors include John Schaubroeck, Sunitha Narendran, Robert J. Taormina, Daniel C. Ganster, Fred Luthans, Mohamed Z. Elbashir, F. Gregory Hayden and François Blais and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Organizational Behavior and European Journal of Marketing.

In The Last Decade

Steve Williams

26 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steve Williams United States 11 370 217 192 127 76 26 734
Kwok Leung Hong Kong 16 445 1.2× 272 1.3× 246 1.3× 134 1.1× 54 0.7× 33 884
Jeanette A. Davy United States 13 508 1.4× 209 1.0× 130 0.7× 105 0.8× 96 1.3× 21 1.0k
Daniel J. Svyantek United States 13 535 1.4× 286 1.3× 208 1.1× 131 1.0× 70 0.9× 29 992
Steven M. Sommer United States 13 514 1.4× 234 1.1× 214 1.1× 115 0.9× 64 0.8× 21 870
Ann Davis United Kingdom 14 557 1.5× 170 0.8× 163 0.8× 133 1.0× 113 1.5× 28 868
David L. Ford United States 16 334 0.9× 216 1.0× 224 1.2× 103 0.8× 54 0.7× 40 776
James A. F. Stoner United States 10 229 0.6× 169 0.8× 209 1.1× 68 0.5× 70 0.9× 35 750
Gail A. Ball United States 10 587 1.6× 242 1.1× 373 1.9× 147 1.2× 81 1.1× 10 1.0k
Paul W. Mulvey United States 12 439 1.2× 269 1.2× 189 1.0× 98 0.8× 28 0.4× 18 784
S. Antonio Ruiz-Quintanilla United States 10 399 1.1× 306 1.4× 209 1.1× 148 1.2× 97 1.3× 20 894

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Williams. The network helps show where Steve Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Williams. Steve Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Williams, Steve. (2016). Business Intelligence Strategy and Big Data Analytics: A General Management Perspective. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 8 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Steve, et al.. (2008). Determinants of managerial risk perceptions and intentions. Journal of Management and Research. 8(2). 59–75. 7 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Steve. (2003). Australian Food Exporters and the European Legal Environment. Journal of Euromarketing. 11(4). 47–64. 1 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Steve, et al.. (2002). Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Intentions: Fair Rewards Versus Fair Treatment. The Journal of Social Psychology. 142(1). 33–44. 154 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Steve. (2000). An Empirical Application of Transaction-Costs Theory to Organizational Design Characteristics. The Journal of Psychology. 134(1). 81–92. 5 indexed citations
6.
Blais, François, et al.. (2000). <title>ShapeGrabber FootScanner: a low cost high accuracy 3D system for the acquisition of human feet</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Steve & Sunitha Narendran. (2000). Determinants of Defender-Prospector Strategic Preferences. UEL Research Repository (University of East London). 4(3-4). 83–105. 2 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Steve, et al.. (1999). Mood and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Effects of Positive Affect on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior Intentions. The Journal of Psychology. 133(6). 656–668. 188 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Steve, et al.. (1999). The Effects of Mood on Managerial Risk Perceptions: Exploring Affect and the Dimensions of Risk. The Journal of Social Psychology. 139(3). 268–287. 42 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Steve. (1999). The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Performance. The Journal of Psychology. 133(2). 183–193. 80 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Steve. (1998). An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination.. PubMed. 124(4). 465–91. 17 indexed citations
12.
Schaubroeck, John & Steve Williams. (1993). Type A behavior pattern and escalating commitment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78(5). 862–867. 6 indexed citations
13.
Schaubroeck, John & Steve Williams. (1993). Type A behavior pattern and escalating commitment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78(5). 862–867. 47 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Steve & Robert J. Taormina. (1993). Unanimous versus Majority Influences on Group Polarization in Business Decision Making. The Journal of Social Psychology. 133(2). 199–205. 16 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Steve. (1993). The Environmental Texture of Seafood Distribution in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 5(3). 3–42. 1 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Steve & Robert J. Taormina. (1992). Group Polarization on Business Decisions in Singapore. The Journal of Social Psychology. 132(2). 265–267. 4 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Steve. (1992). Prospects for Promotion of ″Wild″ Shrimp in Japan:Implications for Australian Exporters. European Journal of Marketing. 26(10). 32–52. 3 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Steve & Fred Luthans. (1992). The impact of choice of rewards and feedback on task performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 13(7). 653–666. 12 indexed citations
19.
Ganster, Daniel C., et al.. (1991). Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(3). 479–483. 28 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Steve. (1990). The effects of choice of rewards upon individual behaviors and attitudes. Insecta mundi. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026