Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude
20031.6k citationsKevin E. Voss, Eric R. Spangenberg et al.Journal of Marketing Researchprofile →
Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale
2014656 citationsFelicitas Morhart, Lucia Malär et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bianca Grohmann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bianca Grohmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bianca Grohmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bianca Grohmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bianca Grohmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bianca Grohmann. The network helps show where Bianca Grohmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bianca Grohmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bianca Grohmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bianca Grohmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bianca Grohmann. Bianca Grohmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Giroux, Marilyn & Bianca Grohmann. (2015). Activating Multiple Facets of the Self: How Identity Facets and Brand Personality Can Influence Self-Brand Connections. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Bodur, H. Onur, et al.. (2014). The Csr Surprise Effect: When Unexpected Csr Activity Enhances Brand Evaluations. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
12.
Lieven, Theo, Bianca Grohmann, Andreas Herrmann, Jan R. Landwehr, & Miriam van Tilburg. (2014). The Effect of Brand Gender on Brand Equity. Psychology and Marketing. 31(5). 371–385.48 indexed citations
13.
Girardin, Florent, Amélie Guèvremont, Felicitas Morhart, Lucia Malär, & Bianca Grohmann. (2013). Brand Authenticity: an Integrative Framework. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
14.
Malär, Lucia, Bettina Nyffenegger, Bianca Grohmann, & Harley Krohmer. (2010). Characteristics of Cult Brands. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
15.
Grohmann, Bianca. (2008). THE EFFECT OF LOGO DESIGN ON BRAND PERSONALITY PERCEPTIONS. 29(3).13 indexed citations
Grohmann, Bianca. (2003). Masculine and Feminine Dimensions of Brand Personality: Initial Steps in Scale Development and Validation. ACR European Advances.1 indexed citations
Voss, Kevin E., Eric R. Spangenberg, & Bianca Grohmann. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research. 40(3). 310–320.1587 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.