Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self
2011925 citationsLucia Malär, Harley Krohmer et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bettina Nyffenegger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bettina Nyffenegger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bettina Nyffenegger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bettina Nyffenegger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bettina Nyffenegger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bettina Nyffenegger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bettina Nyffenegger. The network helps show where Bettina Nyffenegger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bettina Nyffenegger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bettina Nyffenegger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bettina Nyffenegger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bettina Nyffenegger. Bettina Nyffenegger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nyffenegger, Bettina, et al.. (2020). A Typology of Consumer Brand Defenders: When Egoists, Justice Fighters and Brand Fans Defend your Brand. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
Nyffenegger, Bettina, Harley Krohmer, Wayne D. Hoyer, & Lucia Malär. (2014). Service Brand Relationship Quality. Journal of Service Research. 18(1). 90–106.99 indexed citations
Malär, Lucia, Harley Krohmer, Wayne D. Hoyer, & Bettina Nyffenegger. (2011). Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self. Journal of Marketing. 75(4). 35–52.925 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Malär, Lucia, Bettina Nyffenegger, Bianca Grohmann, & Harley Krohmer. (2010). Characteristics of Cult Brands. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
11.
Nyffenegger, Bettina, Lucia Malär, & Harley Krohmer. (2010). Beliefs and Feelings in Consumer-Brand Relationships: Two Components of Brand Relationship Quality. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).
12.
Krohmer, Harley, Lucia Malär, Wayne D. Hoyer, & Bettina Nyffenegger. (2009). The fit between brand personality and consumers' self. The importance of actual versus ideal self for brand performance. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).2 indexed citations
13.
Krohmer, Harley, Lucia Malär, & Bettina Nyffenegger. (2007). The Fit Between Brand Personality and Consumer's Self: The Importance of Self-Congruence for Brand Performance. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.