Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Julia Maldonado‐ValderramaA. Martı́n-Rodrı́guezAlan R. MackieMarı́a José Gálvez-RuizMiguel Wulff-PérezAna-Isabel Mulet-CaberoMiguel A. Cabrerizo‐VílchezTim Foster
- Topics
- Proteins in Food Systems (21 papers)Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (14 papers)Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
33 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Food Science 803
- Molecular Biology 298
- Nutrition and Dietetics 269
- Organic Chemistry 259
- Materials Chemistry 237
Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Torcello‐Gómez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Torcello‐Gómez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Torcello‐Gómez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Torcello‐Gómez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Torcello‐Gómez. The network helps show where Amelia Torcello‐Gómez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amelia Torcello‐Gómez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amelia Torcello‐Gómez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amelia Torcello‐Gómez. Amelia Torcello‐Gómez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 150 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 68 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Amelia Torcello‐Gómez
Amelia Torcello‐Gómez is a scholar working on Food Science, Immunology and Allergy and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (21 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (14 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (803 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (126 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (269 citations). Amelia Torcello‐Gómez has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julia Maldonado‐Valderrama, A. Martı́n-Rodrı́guez, Alan R. Mackie, Marı́a José Gálvez-Ruiz, Miguel Wulff-Pérez, Ana-Isabel Mulet-Cabero, Miguel A. Cabrerizo‐Vílchez, Tim Foster, Christian Jungnickel and Adam Macierzanka. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.