Pharmaceutical Science

302.3k papers and 7.4M indexed citations i.

About

302.3k papers covering Pharmaceutical Science have received a total of 7.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Fluorine in Organic Chemistry, Advanced Drug Delivery Systems and Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems and also cover the fields of Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Inorganic Chemistry. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Biomaterials. Some of the most active scholars covering Pharmaceutical Science are Mark R. Prausnitz, Róbert Langer, Þorsteinn Loftsson, Rainer Müller, George A. Bray, Allan M. Maxam, Walter Gilbert, Andreas Bernkop‐Schnürch, David O’Hagan and Samir Mitragotri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Pharmaceutical Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Pharmaceutical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Pharmaceutical Science.

Countries where authors publish papers about Pharmaceutical Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Pharmaceutical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Pharmaceutical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025