Annals of Internal Medicine

24.7k papers and 2.0M indexed citations i.

About

The 24.7k papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.0M indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine usually cover Epidemiology (3.6k papers), Surgery (3.5k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.9k papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (601 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (553 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (472 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Internal Medicine are David Moher, Penny Whiting, Virginia A. Moyer, William B. Kannel, Andrew S. Levey, Sharon K. Inouye, Tom Greene, Douglas G. Altman, Jan P. Vandenbroucke and Norbert W. Tietz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Internal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Internal Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025