Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Xin Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin Wei more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin Wei. The network helps show where Xin Wei may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xin Wei
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xin Wei.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xin Wei based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Xin Wei. Xin Wei is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wei, Xin, et al.. (2020). A Machine Learning Method for Measuring Information Disclosure in Sharing Economy Platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
Wei, Xin, et al.. (2019). Efficacy Study of the Science Notebook in a Universal Design for Learning Environment: Preliminary Findings.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
Jin, Hui, et al.. (2015). A US-China Interview Study: Biology Students' Argumentation and Explanation about Energy Consumption Issues.. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 10(3). 301–318.
12.
Jin, Hui, et al.. (2015). How Do U.S. and Chinese Biology Students Compare in Explaining Energy Consumption Issues. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.1 indexed citations
13.
Wei, Xin, Mary Wagner, Laura Hudson, Jennifer Yu, & Paul Shattuck. (2015). Transition to Adulthood: Employment, Education, and Disengagement in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders.. Grantee Submission.5 indexed citations
14.
Wei, Xin, et al.. (2014). Postsecondary Pathways and Persistence for STEM versus Non-STEM Majors; Among College Students with an Autism Spectrum Disorder.. Grantee Submission. 44. 1159–1167.1 indexed citations
Schiller, Ellen, et al.. (2012). A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of the Fusion Reading Intervention on Reading Achievement and Motivation for Adolescent Struggling Readers.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.6 indexed citations
Erickson, Varick L., et al.. (2007). Closing the Gap? A Comparison of Changes over Time in White-Black and White-Hispanic Achievement Gaps on State Assessments versus State NAEP. CSE Report 721..1 indexed citations
19.
Li, Wenli & Xin Wei. (2003). Analysis on the Impact of Students Aids on Higher Education Access. 1(3). 0.1 indexed citations
20.
Wei, Xin. (1997). Reform and Development of China's Higher Education System in the Past Decade (Academic Reforms in the World : Situation and Perspective in the Massification Stage of Higher Education : Reports of the 1997 Six-Nation Higher Education Project Seminar : Country Reports). 10. 161–182.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.