Violetta Khoreva
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Communication top 5%
- Demography top 5%
- Co-authors
- Heidi WechtlerKatja EinolaVlad VaimanMaarten van ZalkKati JärviEric BreitSunghoon KimJanne Tienari
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers)Human Resource and Talent Management (6 papers)Employer Branding and e-HRM (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementCommunicationHuman Factors and Ergonomics
- Partner nations
- FinlandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Violetta Khoreva
17 papers receiving 534 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 356
- Social Psychology 91
- Sociology and Political Science 91
- Communication 79
- Demography 74
Countries citing papers authored by Violetta Khoreva
This map shows the geographic impact of Violetta Khoreva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Violetta Khoreva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violetta Khoreva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Violetta Khoreva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Violetta Khoreva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Violetta Khoreva. The network helps show where Violetta Khoreva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Violetta Khoreva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Violetta Khoreva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Violetta Khoreva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Violetta Khoreva. Violetta Khoreva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 93 | |
| 4 | 82 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 136 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 18 |
About Violetta Khoreva
Violetta Khoreva is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication and Safety Research, having authored 17 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (6 papers) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (356 citations), Communication (79 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (23 citations). Violetta Khoreva has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Heidi Wechtler, Katja Einola, Vlad Vaiman, Maarten van Zalk, Kati Järvi, Eric Breit, Sunghoon Kim, Janne Tienari and Tanya Bondarouk. Their work appears in journals such as Human Relations, Human Resource Management and Corporate Governance An International Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.