Thomas F. Reed
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Joel BrocknerSteven L. GroverRocki-Lee DeWittSteven A. GroverMichael N. O'MalleyJane FieldingKaren A. BallardColin MacDougall
- Topics
- Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementPublic AdministrationGeneral Health Professions
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAcademy of Management JournalStrategic Management Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. Reed
18 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
- General Health Professions 474
- Sociology and Political Science 406
- Social Psychology 263
- Demography 164
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Reed. The network helps show where Thomas F. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Reed. Thomas F. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 134 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 78 | |
| 6 | 206 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 98 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 356 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 219 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 342 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Thomas F. Reed
Thomas F. Reed is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Decision Sciences, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.1k citations), Public Administration (95 citations) and General Health Professions (474 citations). Thomas F. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joel Brockner, Steven L. Grover, Rocki-Lee DeWitt, Steven A. Grover, Michael N. O'Malley, Jane Fielding, Karen A. Ballard, Colin MacDougall, Julia M. George and Christopher Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Academy of Management Journal and Strategic Management Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.