This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Noss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Noss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Noss more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Noss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Noss. The network helps show where Richard Noss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Noss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Noss.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Noss based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Noss. Richard Noss is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benton, Laura, Celia Hoyles, Ivan Kalaš, & Richard Noss. (2016). Building mathematical knowledge with programming: insights from the ScratchMaths project. UCL Discovery (University College London).19 indexed citations
4.
Clark‐Wilson, Alison, Celia Hoyles, & Richard Noss. (2015). Conceptualising the scaling of mathematics teachers' professional development concerning technology. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Davies, Paul, Diana Laurillard, Manolis Mavrikis, et al.. (2013). Royal Society Vision Project : the impact of technological change on STEM education.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Rojano, Teresa, et al.. (2011). Critical moments in generalization tasks : building algebraic rules in a Digital Sign System. UCL Discovery (University College London).
9.
Bakker, Arthur, Phillip Kent, Richard Noss, & Celia Hoyles. (2008). Using technology-enhanced boundary objects to develop techno-mathematical literacies in manufacturing industry. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 85–92.1 indexed citations
10.
Mor, Yishay & Richard Noss. (2008). Programming as mathematical narrative. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. 18(2). 214–214.8 indexed citations
11.
Mor, Yishay, Richard Noss, Celia Hoyles, Ken Kahn, & Donald Simpson. (2004). Thinking in process. IOE EPrints. 6(1). 111–22.2 indexed citations
12.
Kent, Phillip & Richard Noss. (2002). The Mathematical Components of Engineering Expertise: End of Award Report. IOE EPrints.1 indexed citations
13.
Noss, Richard & Celia Hoyles. (2000). Changing the Rules: Children, Creativity and Computer Games. 2000(1). 214–219.3 indexed citations
14.
Noss, Richard. (1999). Playing with (and without) words.9 indexed citations
15.
Noss, Richard & David Pratt. (1998). Expressions of Control in Stochastic Processes. Voprosy Onkologii. 58(1). 61–5.2 indexed citations
16.
Noss, Richard. (1998). New Numeracies for a Technological Culture [1].. for the learning of mathematics. 18(2). 2–12.26 indexed citations
17.
Noss, Richard & Adnan Bakı. (1996). Liberating school mathematics from procedural view. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 12(12).12 indexed citations
Noss, Richard. (1982). Language teaching issues in multilingual environments in Southeast Asia.5 indexed citations
20.
Noss, Richard. (1972). The Ungrounded Transformer.. Language Sciences.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.