Peter W. van Rijn

39 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Peter W. van Rijn
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Education 216
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 145
  • Management Science and Operations Research 127
  • Statistics and Probability 64
  • Computer Networks and Communications 63
Replace Andreas Oranje with:
Andreas Oranje United States
André A. Rupp United States
Yasuyo Sawaki Japan
April L. Zenisky United States
Louis V. DiBello United States
Jonathan Weeks United States
Cynthia G. Parshall United States
Gautam Puhan United States
Frederick Cline United States
Laine Bradshaw United States
Peter W. van Rijn relative to Andreas Oranje United States Andreas Oranje's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Andreas Oranje · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. van Rijn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. van Rijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. van Rijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. van Rijn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. van Rijn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. van Rijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. van Rijn. The network helps show where Peter W. van Rijn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter W. van Rijn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter W. van Rijn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter W. van Rijn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter W. van Rijn. Peter W. van Rijn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 0
4 2
5 2
6 1
7 6
8 4
9
Students' Ideas about the NGSS Crosscutting Concept of System and System Models: Evidence From Parallel Assessments.
0
10 15
11 13
12 29
13 8
14 19
15 21
16 34
17 30
18
A Note on Explaining Away and Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Research Report. ETS RR-12-13.
4
19
Categorical time series in psychological measurement
4
20
Logistic models for single-subject time series
3

About Peter W. van Rijn

Peter W. van Rijn is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (15 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (8 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (145 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (127 citations) and Statistics and Probability (64 citations). Peter W. van Rijn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Paul Deane, Randy Elliot Bennett, Mo Zhang, Sandip Sinharay, Matthew Johnson, Shelby J. Haberman, Hongwen Guo, Song Yi, Wim Van der Elst and Jelle Jolles. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Psychologist, Psychometrika and International Journal of Science Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026