Dries Debeer

725 citations
30 papers · 435 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dries Debeer

25 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Dries Debeer
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Management Science and Operations Research 150
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
  • Statistics and Probability 54
  • Computer Science Applications 30
  • Applied Psychology 21
Replace Gilles Raîche with:
Gilles Raîche Canada
Dongbo Tu China
Abe Dirk Hofman Netherlands
Kensuke Okada Japan
Po-Hsi Chen Taiwan
Deborah L. Schnipke United States
Klaus D. Kubinger Austria
Martha D. Petoskey United States
Won‐Chan Lee United States
Fan Jia United States
Dries Debeer relative to Gilles Raîche Canada Gilles Raîche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Gilles Raîche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dries Debeer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dries Debeer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dries Debeer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dries Debeer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dries Debeer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dries Debeer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dries Debeer. The network helps show where Dries Debeer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dries Debeer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dries Debeer Line = papers co-authored together Dries Debeer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020104
2 201391
3 201470
4 201741
5 202029
6 202124
7 202118
8 201910
9 20185
10 20215
11 20254
12 20214
13 20234
14 20174
15 20194
16 20233
17 20233
18 20212
19 20232
20 20232

About Dries Debeer

Dries Debeer is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 30 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (150 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations), Statistics and Probability (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (30 citations) and Applied Psychology (21 citations). Dries Debeer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rianne Janssen, Carolin Strobl, Janine Buchholz, Johannes Hartig, Paul De Boeck, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Bert Reynvoet, Stefanie Vanbecelaere, Fien Depaepe and Peter W. van Rijn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Measurement, Applied Psychological Measurement, Large-scale Assessments in Education, JMIR mhealth and uhealth and Psychosocial Intervention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact