Educational Psychologist

1.1k papers and 120.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Educational Psychologist in the last decades have received a total of 120.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Psychologist usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (671 papers), Education (644 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (334 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (251 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Psychologist are Dale H. Schunk, Albert Bandura, Barry J. Zimmerman, Richard E. Mayer, Andrew J. Elliot, John Sweller, Paul A. Kirschner, K. Ann Renninger, Richard E. Clark and M. C. Wittrock.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Psychologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Psychologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Psychologist.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Psychologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Psychologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Psychologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Psychologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025