Noah Eisenkraft

1.1k total citations
29 papers, 705 citations indexed

About

Noah Eisenkraft is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Noah Eisenkraft has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 705 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Noah Eisenkraft's work include Conflict Management and Negotiation (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Noah Eisenkraft is often cited by papers focused on Conflict Management and Negotiation (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Noah Eisenkraft collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Singapore. Noah Eisenkraft's co-authors include Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Andrew P. Knight, Jared R. Curhan, Michael S. Christian, Avni Shah, Tanya L. Chartrand, James R. Bettman, Aiwa Shirako, Lucio Baccaro and Sigal G. Barsade and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of Consumer Research.

In The Last Decade

Noah Eisenkraft

27 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Noah Eisenkraft United States 13 318 288 242 111 71 29 705
Kenneth Tai Singapore 12 355 1.1× 388 1.3× 284 1.2× 113 1.0× 82 1.2× 16 768
Naomi B. Rothman United States 13 397 1.2× 392 1.4× 376 1.6× 98 0.9× 97 1.4× 22 911
Arik Cheshin Israel 13 415 1.3× 393 1.4× 236 1.0× 60 0.5× 58 0.8× 24 861
Michelle Singer Foust United States 3 203 0.6× 208 0.7× 291 1.2× 113 1.0× 59 0.8× 5 646
Michael Howe United States 12 180 0.6× 231 0.8× 223 0.9× 83 0.7× 73 1.0× 16 592
Jordan M. Robbins United States 4 335 1.1× 280 1.0× 191 0.8× 76 0.7× 88 1.2× 7 722
Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang China 12 201 0.6× 277 1.0× 359 1.5× 123 1.1× 49 0.7× 26 630
SinHui Chong United States 11 303 1.0× 300 1.0× 443 1.8× 136 1.2× 53 0.7× 16 772
Peter Belmi United States 10 239 0.8× 208 0.7× 101 0.4× 75 0.7× 70 1.0× 17 486
Russell P. Guay United States 11 170 0.5× 246 0.9× 324 1.3× 111 1.0× 31 0.4× 18 665

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Eisenkraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Eisenkraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Eisenkraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Eisenkraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Eisenkraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Eisenkraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Eisenkraft. The network helps show where Noah Eisenkraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah Eisenkraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah Eisenkraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah Eisenkraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noah Eisenkraft. Noah Eisenkraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Jared R. Curhan, & Noah Eisenkraft. (2022). Negotiator Consistency, Counterpart Consistency, and Reciprocity in Behavior Across Partners: A Round-Robin Study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 49(7). 1071–1085. 1 indexed citations
2.
Eisenkraft, Noah. (2018). When Do Degree Centrality and Tie Strength Centrality have Divergent Validity?. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018(1). 10357–10357. 1 indexed citations
3.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Noah Eisenkraft, Jared R. Curhan, & Lisabeth F. DiLalla. (2017). On the relative importance of individual-level characteristics and dyadic interaction effects in negotiations: Variance partitioning evidence from a twins study.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 103(1). 88–96. 19 indexed citations
4.
Eisenkraft, Noah, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, & Shirli Kopelman. (2017). We Know Who Likes Us, but Not Who Competes Against Us. Psychological Science. 28(2). 233–241. 13 indexed citations
5.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, et al.. (2017). Who Makes an Effective Negotiator? A Personality-Theoretic Approach to a Longstanding Question. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Eisenkraft, Noah. (2016). Dichotomizing Network Data Can Change The Meaning of Actor Centrality. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 13383–13383. 2 indexed citations
7.
Shah, Avni, et al.. (2015). ‘Paper Or Plastic’: How We Pay Influences Post-Transaction Connection. ACR North American Advances. 5 indexed citations
8.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Sigal G. Barsade, & Noah Eisenkraft. (2015). The social perception of emotional abilities: Expanding what we know about observer ratings of emotional intelligence.. Emotion. 15(1). 17–34. 36 indexed citations
9.
Shah, Avni, Noah Eisenkraft, James R. Bettman, & Tanya L. Chartrand. (2015). Paper or Plastic?”: How We Pay Influences Post-Transaction Connection. Journal of Consumer Research. 42(5). 688–708. 75 indexed citations
10.
Knight, Andrew P. & Noah Eisenkraft. (2014). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(4). 1214–1227. 152 indexed citations
11.
Eisenkraft, Arthur & Noah Eisenkraft. (2011). When Wrong Answers Receive Top Grades. The journal of college science teaching. 41(2). 28–31.
12.
Curhan, Jared R., Hillary Anger Elfenbein, & Noah Eisenkraft. (2010). The Objective Value of Subjective Value: A Multi‐Round Negotiation Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40(3). 690–709. 92 indexed citations
13.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Maw‐Der Foo, Manas K. Mandal, et al.. (2010). Individual differences in the accuracy of expressing and perceiving nonverbal cues: New data on an old question. Journal of Research in Personality. 44(2). 199–206. 15 indexed citations
14.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, et al.. (2010). Why are Some Negotiators Better than Others? Opening the Black Box of Bargaining Behaviors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
15.
Eisenkraft, Noah. (2010). r<sub>WG</sub> IS NOT ENOUGH: DETECTING SUBGROUP DISAGREEMENT.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2010(1). 1–6. 1 indexed citations
16.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Noah Eisenkraft, & Waverly W. Ding. (2009). Do We Know Who Values Us?. Psychological Science. 20(9). 1081–1083. 21 indexed citations
17.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, et al.. (2009). Why are Some Negotiators Better than Others? Opening the Black Box of Bargaining Behaviors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
18.
Langer, Ellen J., et al.. (2008). Orchestral performance and the footprint of mindfulness. Psychology of Music. 37(2). 125–136. 35 indexed citations
19.
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Jared R. Curhan, Noah Eisenkraft, Aiwa Shirako, & Lucio Baccaro. (2008). Are some negotiators better than others? Individual differences in bargaining outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality. 42(6). 1463–1475. 72 indexed citations
20.
Curhan, Jared R., Hillary Anger Elfenbein, & Noah Eisenkraft. (2008). The Objective Value of Subjective Value: A Multi-round Negotiation Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026